The heliocentric model was generally rejected by the ancient philosophers for three main reasons:
1) If the Earth is rotating about its axis, and orbiting around the Sun, then the Earth must be in motion. However, we cannot ``feel'' this motion. Nor does this motion give rise to any obvious observational consequences. Hence, the Earth must be stationary.
—————————————
2) If the Earth is executing a circular orbit around the Sun then the positions of the stars should be slightly different when the Earth is on opposite sides of the Sun. This effect is known as parallax. Since no stellar parallax is observable (at least, with the naked eye), the Earth must be stationary. In order to appreciate the force of this argument, it is important to realize that ancient astronomers did not suppose the stars to be significantly further away from the Earth than the planets. The celestial sphere was assumed to lie just beyond the orbit of Saturn.
—————————————
3)The geocentric model is far more philosophically attractive than the heliocentric model, since in the former model the Earth occupies a privileged position in the Universe.
<h2>
I have no clue </h2>
here is my favorite songs by Ed sheeran
Answer:
A. Increase awareness of the differences in discourse conventions across different groups
Explanation:
According to the Gumperz reading and the video ‘Crosstalk’, the best way to address cross-cultural miscommunication is to <em>increase awareness of the differences in discourse conventions across different groups. </em>Gumpertz was a linguist who studied socio-linguistic and called it ethnography of communication. He studied the variation of discourse in different speech communities. The culture of the interlocutors affected both the discourse and meaning.
Answer: encouraged many farmers peoples to become hunters and herders
Explanation:
