<span>Some people have different viewpoints on what constitutes "risk" and they see the future in varying degrees of such. Some people worry that there may not be enough money for themselves or their families in the future, so they want to ameliorate this risk by saving up now, while others see less risk in not having funds in the future, so they are less likely to want to save at present.</span>
Answer:
Conflict perspective.
Explanation:
This is curled or drafted from Karl Marks works which talks about causes an consequences of the elite or higher beings in the societies against the lower or those in the poorer levels.
Conflict theory talks about tensions and conflicts arising when resources, status, and power are unevenly distributed between groups in society and that these conflicts become the engine for social change. Here, power can be seen as control of material resources and accumulated wealth, control of politics and the institutions that make up society, and one's social status relative to others which are not only by class but by race, gender, sexuality, culture, and religion, among other things.
Answer:
vassals
Explanation:
A king (or lord) ruled large areas of land. To protect his land from invasion, the king gave parts of it to local lords, who were called vassals. In return, his vassals promised to fight to defend the king's lan
Answer:
6 packages of hot dogs and 6 packages of buns
Explanation:
The indifference curves follow the 45-degree so the ratio for the hot dog:bun will be 1:1. Each package of hot dog gives 8 hot dogs while each package of the bun gives 8 hot dog buns. The ratio of hot dog package: buns package that Sue needs will be:
(number of hot dogs every package)/ (number of buns every package) * (ratio of hot dog : bun)
8/8 * 1/1= 1
The optimal choice package ratio is 1:1, then the amount of food Sue can buy will be: 48$/ (1*$5 + 1*$3)= $48/$8= 6 package.
The optimal choice is 6 packages of hot dogs and 6 packages of buns
