The treaty of Versailles was a bad idea. It benefited countries like Britain, France and America as they where the top powers to come out of the war. It blamed all of the damages caused to their countries squarely on the Germans simply because Germany was the best target. The German where forced to surrender all their foreign lands. They where forbidden from entering the Rhineland. They where forbidden from uniting with Austria. They where forced to pay reparations to the winning side after the war, leaving the German people and the Wiemar republic in poverty! If it wasn't for all these terms suppressing Germany, Hitler would never pushed the boundaries of the treaty, the Nazi's where unlikely to ever rise to such power as they where elected as a last hope when Germany lost faith in democracy and therefore Britain would not have had to declare war on Germany for taking over Poland and Slovakia, entering the Rhine and uniting with Austria. It is often said that WW1 was just a build up to world war two, as if it wasn't for the treaty of versailles none of this was ever going to or even had a possibility f happening.
Answer:
Over cultural differences, as well as slavery, language, and religions
Answer:
Ang temang nais ipahiwwatig ng awaiting “Dapat Tama” ay ang bumoto nang wasto at piliin nang maigi ang mga politikong iluluklok sa puwesto.
Ang katagang “Dapat Tama” ay paalala sa ating mga botante kung gaano kahalaga ang nag-iisa nating boto.
Dapat tama kasi ang pipiliin natin dahil sa oras na maibigay na natin ang ating boto ay hindi na ito mababawi at kung sino man ang iluklok natin ay sila ang hahawak sa kinabukasan ng ating bayan.
Kaya naman hindi basta-basta ang desisyon sa pagpili ng mga iboboto kaya naman dapat ay pag-isipang mabuti at kilalanin ang mga kandidato upang mapili ang tama.
The main way in which artisan guilds changed labor and social class in medieval Europe is that it gave the artisans, who were mostly members of the lower class, more power--since these guilds acted somewhat like a modern "union" and helped them negotiate better pay.
Answer:
Alexander Hamilton and George Mason.
Explanation:
Alexander Hamilton who served as a representative to the Constitutional Convention from New York was a federalist. Along with James Madison and John Jay, Alexander Hamilton penned the Federalist Papers and while signing the new constitution he was worried about the fact that the government under this constitution would become too democratic, whereas, George Mason, (who was also a representative to the Constitutional Convention of 1787) refused to sign the new constitution on the basis that the new constitution was not democratic enough.