The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Do you consider Bishop Eusebius’s account to be reliable?
No, really not.
The reason why because his account had created many controversies.
Eusebius has been known as the official historian of the church. He participated in the Council of Nice in 314, organized by Roman Emperor Constantine to revise the religious or historic documents that would end up being in the Bible.
So Eusebius based most of his comments on personal opinions and other historic document's interpretations. It is difficult to say that he did the proper research and had reliable sources. During the Nicea Council, a group of Bishops decided what documents had to be part of the Bible and which not, based on their own criteria. That is not a good indicator of the validity of the documents included, even less we can consider those as sacred.
Answer:
Kryzys przysięgowy[edytuj]
Kryzys przysięgowy – kryzys związany z odmową złożenia przysięgi na wierność Królestwu Polskiemu i dotrzymanie braterstwa broni wojskom Niemiec i Austro-Węgier do końca wojny przez żołnierzy Legionów Polskich (głównie I i III Brygady) 9 i 11 lipca 1917.
Option D. It banned slavery in the Indian Territory was not the feature of Chickasaw's constitution.
The Constitution clearly says " The legislature has no power to pass laws for the emancipation of slaves without the consent of their owners, nor without paying their owners previous to such emancipation a full equivalent in money for the slave so emancipated".
To the judicial branch to be interpreted and then the executive enforces laws
Answer:
A
Explanation:
I know the answer THX to the textbook
