I think it is ethically appropriate because he's taking a real thing that's happening and talking about it. It's giving him a topic to say about that might allow others to connect with or understand. Also depends on the topic
Answer:
yes, and what is the question?
Explanation:
1 and 3 are correct, this is due to the fact that modern technology is constantly growing and other developed nations are feeling threatened or inferior when another developed nation grows further ahead. National security has also grown global, just the threat of a foreign country developing nuclear capability is enough for another country to launch missle strikes or other acts in order to quell the threat of another nuclear capable country. 2 is not correct because industrial strategies are being shared throughout the world constantly and the safety of a country no longer stands by their standing army or navy, but by the threat of nuclear capability or a possibility of retaliation through explosive nature. Even today, most wars are done through the army holding down a line, and the navy/airforce launching long ranged missile attacks of various nature.
In richmond indiana 47374
Answer:
i.d say because its says the whole universe and theres not really a option between neither and then
