Answer: A) Liberty versus stability and order
Explanation:
Scenario not attached but this should be the correct answer.
In the debate about surveillance in the United States, the principles of liberty and stability and law and order seem to always clash. The bone of contention is that people should have the liberty to live life as they want without worrying about the government snooping on them.
The principle of stability and order however, calls for surveillance so that behavior that is not in the best interests of the country can be curbed.
For this reason, these two principles keep clashing in reference to surveillance.
It depends on what type of government the country is. Take an example, Great Britain (England, Britain, whatever it is called.) is a monarchy, which means that they have royal families... like how we have the president. (in the U.S at least) It can also be dependent on what the country decides to do, or the president decides. I hope this helps!
Answer and Explanation:
Notes: Slavery allows it to be so harmful that it changes even the most kind people, making them mean. Education empowers the oppressed. Education is a powerful weapon for blacks. Deprivation can be used as an incentive. Nobody liked to be called an oppressor, even though it was.
I decided to take notes on the most important themes exposed by Douglass. These themes were discovered by reading chapter 6 and by interpreting why Douglass decided to include these moments of his life in his narrative.
The first theme that I noticed is that slavery was widespread and prejudicial to everyone, even for the arms. Slavery placed cruelty in the hearts of white people and made them lose their kindness and kindness by becoming cruel and unworthy. I also noticed that white people were very afraid to allow blacks to have access to education. This is because education allowed the critical thinking that would give blacks the power to fight against the system that oppressed them.
Douglass was deprived of studying, but this deprivation motivated him to strive and receive an education that would make big differences in his life. Last but not least, we can see that the whites knew that the violence of slavery was incorrect, since they did not want them to know that they were extremely violent and oppressive to the slaves they owned.
The author uses several rhetorical strategies that range from personal statements, which increase our empathy for him, to logical and correct statements that show us how that whole slave system worked and how it was manipulated to last. This all causes an extension of what we know about slavery.
Answer:
Talk it out
Explanation:
I know this sounds basic but talk it out and make a compromise of some sort lol
Plz mark brainliest
