The question is incomplete. This is the complete question:
The state trial court in Nevada has issued a decision in which a party has been found guilty of fraud. Should a case arise in the future with the same basic fact situation, Nevada courts will be bound by precedent to follow the reasoning and decision of this prior decision.
Answer:
No, should a case arise in the future with the same basic fact situation, Nevada state trial courts will not be bound by precedent to follow the reasoning and decision of this prior decision, because the decisions of trial courts do not use precedents or rulings established in previous legal cases to arrive at decisions on future disputes involving different or entirely new parties.
The Government's Power of Eminent Domain
Eminent domain is the power of the government to take private land for public use. This power is limited by the federal Constitution and by state Constitutions. ... The government provides the landowner a fair price, and the landowner yields the property to public use.
Answer:
Humans contribute an increase of carbon dioxide emissions by burning fossil fuels, deforestation, and cement production. Methane (CH4) is largely released by coal, oil, and natural gas industries. Although methane is not mass-produced like carbon dioxide, it is still very prevalent.
A
PLEASE MARK ME AS BRAINLIEST
Explanation:
A. True the parent is responsible for the safety of the child in all cases
Should Oregon pass a statute that prohibited advertisement by liquor stores, it would amount to an unreasonable restriction of free speech and therefore invalid.
The correct answer is D.
<h3>The Law Backing Freedom of Speech and Expression</h3>
The First Amendment guarantees that citizen of the United States is free to express themselves in relation to their religion, expression, assembly, and also grants the right to petition.
There are situations where this freedom may be withdrawn. Please learn more at the link below:
brainly.com/question/243946
