Rulers of Indian states did not have autonomy under the British Rule.
Explanation:
The amount of power the ruler had over his dominion were nominal at best and their royalty was subject to the British as they could cite any reason and annex their land from them.
The amount of power the ruler had was also dependent on how closely the British were involved in their territory.
This was to be seen in places like Delhi and Calcutta where the British influence was more than in fringes like Kerala and Orrissa where the King still had more power.
The power of the ruler was subject to the needs and interference of the British.
Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/15650754#readmore
There are several ways in which some non-Jews oppose Hitler’s “Final Solution”, but many of them were brave enough to actively write Hitler's administration in protest. Some would also help Jews flee the country.
Answer: Native Americans fiercely resisted European dominance in the beginning of the eighteenth century. The Pueblo, Tuscarora, and Yamasee Indians fought against European encroachment.
