jawab:
kata pengantar adalah kata pendahuluan atau pandangan umum secara singkat dan jelas sebagai pendahuluan suatu karya tulis. Biasanya, kata pengantar berisi rasa syukur atau terima kasih dari penulis kepada pihak yang telah membantunya menyelesaikan suatu karya.
translate?
sorry ... i live in indonesian
A sample of a text that we can use to illustrate how to make a summary and analysis would be <em>Animal Farm</em> by George Orwell.
The summary of the book is the behavior of the animals after they had successfully overthrown the humans because they did not like how they were treated, but ended up being worse than the humans who they overthrew.
The analysis of the book is that it is an allegorical narration that mirrors the Russian Revolution and its use of animals that could talk and reason like humans helped make it more entertaining and gave it a refreshing perspective,.
<h3>What is a Summary?</h3>
This refers to the concise representation of the main points of a text in an objective manner.
Hence, we can see that A sample of a text that we can use to illustrate how to make a summary and analysis would be <em>Animal Farm</em> by George Orwell is given above,
Read more about Animal Farm here:
brainly.com/question/11752825
#SPJ1
Answer: think about how to summarize the text.
Explanation:
The central idea of a text refers to the main point that an author is making about a particular topic. It is referred to as the author's primary message.
Sometimes the central idea in a text can be stated but sometimes can as be inferred. In such case, it's important to summarize the text in order to derive the main point.
Therefore, the correct option is B
A. playful
<span>The scene is meant to be funny and the seriousness of the human characters is the classic "straight man" to the chimpanzee's buffoonery. </span>
<span>If you analyze funny scenes / acts, you'll see that there is often a buffoon who says wild things and a "straight man" who doesn't get the joke. This makes the audience feel very clever and it laughs.</span>
Answer:
Jem had to go back for his pants because the lie Dill told to Atticus didn't involve his pants being destroyed, only lost. He said he had lost them in "strip poker." Jem couldn't argue with that lie and come up with a better one where the pants were actually destroyed or else he would risk exposing the lie, so he had to go along with it.
If he hadn't come up with the pants relatively soon, Atticus would have punished him for losing them permanently, a punishment Jem seemed eager to avoid when he said he had not been "whipped" for a long time and he didn't want it to happen again. He clearly has a healthy respect for Atticus and is also afraid of the whip, as he should be. Atticus would have either punished him for losing the pants (something it would cost money to replace) or have punished him for lying, had he found out how the pants were really lost.
So, Jem really had no choice but to go back for his pants, as scary as that prospect was.
Explanation:
