Answer:
B. The time spent on the task
Explanation:
The time that Dana spends carrying out her task is a cost to her. That cost can be calculated by ascertaining the gains or benefits she has missed due to the research.
If Dana were not doing the research, she would be engaged in other activities. Those activities could have been of benefit to her, be it financially or otherwise. The benefits foregone are the cost of Dana doing the research.
Moral Hazard occurs when a person increases its exposure to risk because someone else bears the the cost of those risk(Insurance companies)
Explanation:
Moral Hazard usually occurs when their is information asymmetry,the risk taking party has more information than the risk incurring party.
The financial crisis of 2008 is the best example of the Moral Hazard Problem.
The Moral Hazard Problem arises because the managers of the financial firm took over riskier investments because they believed that the federal government will save them from the bankruptcy.
Answer:
Concentrated Targeting Strategy
Explanation:
Concentrated Targeting Strategy refers to a situation in which an organization focus its marketing efforts on only a specific segment of the market. That is, only one marketing mix is developed.
Concentrated Targeting Strategy allows the producer focus on the needs and wants of a particular segment of the consumers/ population. The producer directs all it's efforts to the satisfaction of a segment of the consumers.
Concentrated Targeting Strategy could be disadvantageous if the demand of the focused segment of consumers is low. Low demand will affect the financial position of an organization.
Answer:
inventory value=$ 377,000.00
Explanation:
In applying the rule of the lower cost of cost or net realizable value,we compare NRV(selling price minus cost to sell) with the replacement cost(current price), where the lower of the two is then compared against the original cost of the inventory item as done in the attached.
Value of inventory=$120,000+$126,000+$90,000+$41,000=$377,000.00
Answer:
C. strictly liable for Will's injuries
Explanation:
In law, Strict liability is a situation when defendant is required to be responsible to a certain situation, but can't be considered as guilty to any violation.
There are two points that need to be highlighted from the case above:
1. Astor Manufacturing process has fulfilled all of its safety regulation for storing the dangerous product.
2. The dangerous product owned by Astor Manufacturing caused William's injury.
The regulations for hazard management is created by the government, and the leak is not caused by their negligence. It's caused by unexpected natural disaster. This is why we can't say that Astor is guilty to any violation.
But still, the chemical that they created injured William. The court will most likely force Astor to be responsible for all the medical expenses incurred by william.
