"The power to prevent harmful speech against government" was the power given to Congress by the “clear and present danger” rule.
<u>Option: B</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
It is a doctrine introduced by the U.S. Supreme Court to decide in which conditions to impose limitations on the First Amendments. This was developed in the Schenck vs. US situation. This was a freedom of speech test so it's not being abused for the country's assault.
The "clear and present danger" principle advocated the use of an improvement test to monitor the state's limits of free speech on a case-by-case basis. If the Court found that there was a "clear and present danger" that the discussion would produce mischief that Congress had taboo, then the state would be legitimized in restricting the discussion at that stage.
Explanation:
C. They promoted an extreme form of nationalism to gain the support of citizens in Italy and Germany.
D. They
Answer:
D he tells it as an exciting story
Explanation:
False. China has forecast it's economy to be twice the size of America by 2050 so that means it will have the latest technology. It would be true for Iran though.
