1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
posledela
2 years ago
14

Congress passed the Southern Homestead Act in 1866. This act was meant to

History
1 answer:
dimaraw [331]2 years ago
5 0
You’re answer will be C. Because they took the land for ex slaves after the American Civil War
You might be interested in
Why did America change its mind about Prohibition? The 18Th
34kurt

Answer: hope this helped

America called for a repeal of the 18th amendment because prohibition promoted crime, there were concerns about lack of enforcement of the law and the loss of economic opportunity. Prohibition provided criminals a stepping stool that provided them to spread and influence crime

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Trace the events that led the
HACTEHA [7]

Answer:

The attack on Pearl Harbor

Explanation:

The attack on Pearl Harbor was a strike on U.S. from Japan but they had done this because although the U.S. had stayed neutral they were still giving Great Britain and other Ally powers supplies.

3 0
3 years ago
World war i brought increased immigration to the united states from which country?
ale4655 [162]
World War I (WWI) brought immigrants from various countries, but the most number of immigrants came from one country; and that country was <u>Mexico.</u><u />

I hope this helps!
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which caused the most conflict between the early settlers in the west and the native Americans?
kvv77 [185]

Answer:

competition for resources

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
HELP MEEEEE
Dmitry [639]

Answer:

This case involves a federal death sentence imposed on defendant-appellant Fields for conviction of a federal capital offense. Fields was sentenced to death largely on the basis of the opinion of a psychiatrist who stated that he could confidently predict Fields would be dangerous in the future. The psychiatrist testified that he did not know of any "standard psychiatric or medical procedures used in arriving at a determination or predicting future dangerousness" and that he was unaware of specific empirical data or studies. He issued his opinion without engaging in any testing or any other objective measures or use of an actuarial method. His basis for this opinion was discussions with the prosecutors and review of some records regarding the defendant. The defense attorney objected to the testimony as unreliable under the standards for expert testimony established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrill Dow Pharmaceutical (i.e., that proffered evidence must be grounded in scientific reasoning or methodology). The district court overruled the objections and allowed the expert testimony to go to the jury.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why did the mexican government think they could win a war against the united states?
    8·1 answer
  • What are two things the Radical Republicans insisted be part of their Reconstruction plan?
    11·2 answers
  • Who were the mayans ?
    12·2 answers
  • What steps has the international community taken to address humanitarian crises throughout the twentieth and twenty-first centur
    6·1 answer
  • What was Hammurabi purpose for writing the code of Hammurabi
    10·2 answers
  • In what ways did the American revolution reshape America?
    5·2 answers
  • What political rights did men in England have that colonial men did not?
    15·2 answers
  • What Effects Did The Gold Rush Have On California?​
    13·1 answer
  • How was rome affect by the puniac wars?
    6·2 answers
  • How are power oppression and privilege connected?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!