Answer:
B
Explanation:
Ratings does not have affect on the validity of the source, it only shows the exposure said show/source received the day it was aired. It doesn't mean anything in terms of reliability.
Meanwhile exaggeration, leaving out information, and reformatting events for entertainment purposes all have great impacts on the reliability of a source.
The other options are very important questions while reviewing any source but in this case B is the correct option.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Institutional Racism is “the systematic distribution of resources, power
and opportunity in our society to the benefit of people who are white and the exclusion of
people of color.”
<h2>
Answer:</h2>
How could the headline best be revised to make it objective?
✔ Valido’s Conduct under Review
How could the first sentence of the article be revised to improve objectivity?
✔ by removing "unpopular" and "conservative"
How could the reporter balance Senator Saud’s comments to make the article more objective?
✔ by adding a comment from a Republican senator
(Photo for proof at the bottom.)
<h2>
Explanation:</h2>
Objective means non-biased, or free of opinions. Replacing the original headline with "Valido’s Conduct under Review" could be more objective because it does not have bribery in the name. Bribery has a negative connotation and putting it in a title is possibly attacking a person. That is my best guess for this answer, I think the original title is already objective.
Removing "unpopular" and "conservative" improves objectivity because unpopular is an opinionated word that can be used to attack someone. Conservative seems to have a negative connotation in this case, so it could be biased. Reporting information from both sides also improves objectivity, as it shows you're not leaning towards one side.
Here's a photo of Edge just incase.
I'd say Compassionate.
While it is clear and straightforward, I don't think the author was being forceful. Nothing was being forced onto anyone. Reassuring? Partly, but the purpose is not to reassure; the author is providing a claim and stance on a controversial issue. The tone is not disappointed, either.
Compassionate would be the best answer. The author is using emotional and thiecal appeals, or pathos and ethos.
I'm sorry to say but you need to look in the text since you need text evidence