Answer: A lot of history is untold, or is half true and half real (there’s propaganda and yellow journalism). Primary sources are more accurate but if the author is not objective and is biased, it will make his or her words less trustable. Also, secondary sources, which are sources from people who analyze the primary sources, are based on the interpretation of the author and his way of thinking/opinion. This makes the documentaries that actually survived the passing of time to modern day not as reliable just looking at one source. When looking at multiple sources, they will have different points of view and it is based on our own inferences to figure out what is the closest and accurate answer based on evidence from different sources.
Explanation:
Answer: BROTHERS AND SISTERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Explanation: BASICALLY EVERY DAY MY BROTHER AND SISTERS ANNOY ME TO DEATH! AND I LOVE THEM VERY MUCH BUT I HATE THEM FOR ANNOYING ME SO THAT'S WHAT I HATE BUT LOVE AT THE SAME TIME...
You're Welcome!:)!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(:
According to social identity theory, individuals view their own group favorably so as to: <span>think of themselves more favorably
This will make them feel a sense superiority toward other people that do not belong in their group. If they do not try to control this type of thinking, they could be trapped in an echo chamber where they secluded themselves from other people's opinion besides their group's.</span>
The answer is Science – Practitioner Gap. This is because there
is a division between psychologists who believe that it should be primary
science versus those who believe that clinical practice should be primary be an
art. The Gap into science practitioner sometimes can make chaos to its modern
clinical practice.
