Answer:
B: Tolerating sweatshop conditions
Explanation:
I suppose C & D is one sentence... failing to meet shareholders expectations is not an ethical issue but an economic one. Manufacturing luxury consumer goods as such is not unethical, even if the manufacturing takes place in an underdeveloped country. That is, when the workers there are treated with respect (wages, conditions etc.). Unfortunately and as a rule they are not, which means that tolerating workers sweatshop conditions is unethical.
Answer:
See explanation
Explanation:
It is right for university lecturers to do so, since they are not breaking any law or regulations, from my own point of view. You said that we should assume that the said lecturer, Professor Harry is my supervisor and he just published the results of is research- his own research, the research belongs to him, the research is his intellectual property and he should have the right to sell or not to sell.
Let us consider the Bayh-Dole Act, which allowed universities to keep and profit from the patents their students and researchers developed on campus using federal funds.
So, if this is allowed, professors should also be able to commercialize their research(es).
That is where the Jim crow laws of segregation were dominant.
This specification is known as arbitration and is a part of the fair resolution process. If both parties agree, then the case can be taken to a different court that is not part of the national court system of the parties. Example can be going to the international court of justice in Strasbourg if you feel that your human rights were violated.