Answer:
the British
Explanation:
On September 13, 1759, the British under General James Wolfe (1727-59) achieved a dramatic victory when they scaled the cliffs over the city of Quebec to defeat French forces under Louis-Joseph de Montcalm on the Plains of Abraham (an area named for the farmer who owned the land)
Answer:
Yes. Such an action constitutes a tort and a crime.
Explanation:
A tort is a wrong done to another person while a crime is the breaking of the law of the state or Federal government. Put simply, a tort is a wrongdoing on a personal level while a crime is a wrongdoing on a societal level, while tort is privately morally wrong, crime is publicly legally wrong.
In the scenario above there is a 'tort' because the employees are spitting into the food of those they do not like. This is on a personal level as they are not spitting into the food of every customer but only the food of those they dislike. Also, a crime exists because this is happening at a public place. It can be said that those restaurants are intentionally serving unhealthy foods to members of the public and both the owners and employees of those restaurants could be charged.
Answer:
D. Eastern Europe is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Answer:
A. Uruk
Explanation:
At one point in time (around 2900 BC), Uruk was regarded as the Largest City in the world. This city was located near Euphrates River, which made it easy for the agricultural sector in the city to flourish.
The river also enable the people in the city to freely travel to distribute various types of goods to other territory. This made the city able to accumulate a lot of wealth. At the peak of its power, this city had around 80,000 population (which a lot for early societies in that era)
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
Using Atheistic worldview.
It is generally believed that, atheist do things or acts based on logical conclusion, rather than following the laid down rules or mode of living set out by God and prophets.
Thus, atheist would view human nature, purpose, and flourishing based on their own experience or conscious self reasoning, instead of seeking God for answers on those questions, by looking for meanings through scriptures or word of God.
To the athiest, human nature will be a composition of his biological instincts and physical experience. The question of purpose to athiest will be based on self definitions, rather than central purpose or destiny, and question of flourishing will also be based on personal evaluation in comparison to his immediate or socio-enviroment.
