These are the choices I found on the internet:
a. make allowances for differences across industries and between firms.
b. set standards that are applicable to all situations and does not recognize unique circumstances.
c. set a minimum requirement and then allows the firm to determine the most efficient method for achieving this requirement.
d. determine the most efficient method for different industries.
It would be letter B - set standards that are applicable to all situations and does not recognize unique circumstances. The command-and-control regulation is inflexible. It usually demands the same standard for all polluters. This means that it draws no distinctions between firms.
Answer:
B. Spearman
Explanation:
Charles Spearman was a psychologist who proposed a theory of intelligence. According to him, there's a general factor (the g factor) that can be defined as the overall mental capacity of a person and that it's shown when this person performs cognitive tasks.
According to him, there are no different types of intelligence but just a general factor that determines the "intelligence" of a person and, by determining the value of this factor we could determine one person mental capacities.
Unlike the other authors given in the option, he is the <u>only one</u> who thinks there's a <u>single factor behind intelligence measures </u>(Thurstone believed there were different mental abilities, Gardner proposed the theory of multiple intelligences and Sternberg thought that there were 3 types of intelligence)
Therefore, we can conclude that Spearman would have been the most enthusiastic about the value of a single intelligence test score as an index of an individual's mental capacities.
