1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lisa [10]
3 years ago
7

_is the act of comparing pieces of evidence to see where they agree and/or

History
1 answer:
natta225 [31]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: Corroboration

Explanation: Corroborating evidence (or corroboration) is evidence that tends to support a proposition that is already supported by some initial evidence, therefore confirming the proposition.

You might be interested in
What did Hitler do when he saw the March on Rome?
mihalych1998 [28]
Well hitler was fascist so I’m guessing he would have supported it
8 0
4 years ago
Why did the Roman calendar include, and the government pay for so many religious festivals?
Serjik [45]

Answer:

Festivals were also held in ancient Rome in response to particular events, or for a particular purpose such as to propitiate or show gratitude toward the gods. The rituals consisted of festivals, offerings (often of food or wine), and animal sacrifices. These rituals had to be carried out regularly and correctly in order to retain the favor of the gods towards the state, household, or individual.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
What arguments could be made for or against forcing people to buy health insurance?
scZoUnD [109]

This is in my opinion one of the aspects that makes the central courts and the different lines of thought within a single subject so interesting. The clash of ideas that we have in this case is a perfect example.

On one side we have those who look at the current 30 million uninsured Americans, which include millions in Texas, and the undeniable success it had in Massachusetts. Most of them conclude that this mandate is a government success.

On the other hand, we can find those who believe that this is a terrible invasion of the government to the citizen's free will to choose their own healthcare options, they see government overreach, and at the same time an unprecedented intrusion on individual liberties to which there is no justification.

Unfortunately this is something that millions of Americans have been forced into. It's evident how they refused to create a public health care system, and instead give more power to the private sector.

After this short debate of ideas, I will give you one question to ponder on: Which principle is more important? Your freedom, your civil liberties, and your freedom from the government line of thought, or the possibilty of providing health care to millions of uninsured Americans?

I hope this solves your question!

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
All of the following are disadvantages of migration for the host country except A. Disagreement between different religious grou
icang [17]

Answer: Reduction in labor shortages(D)

Explanation:

Migration is the movement of people from one geographicsl area to another. It could be the movement of people from one country to another or from one state to another.

Migration can lead to the disagreement between different religious groups. Due to the influx of people into an area, there can be religious conflicts when the people share different opinions regarding their religion.

Migration can also lead to increase in the cost of health care. As there are more people in the state, there'll be more cases of sick people or people who need medical attention. Migration can also lead to overcrowding in cities because of the larger number of people.

Reduction in labor shortages is an advantage of migration. Migration means there'll be more labor supply and firms can employ the available workers. This will lead to labor shortages.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
what characteristics of the Confederate States of America made it a confederate government when compared to the government of th
slavikrds [6]

A federal government and a confederate government differ in where the majority of the power lies.  In a federal government the central government holds the most power and states have less.  In a confederate government the states hold the majority of the power.  The Confederate States of America acted as sovereign states with each state having little influence from a more powerful central government.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What religion did the Persian ruler Darius I promote?
    6·1 answer
  • What more than anything else drove u.s. expansion in the late nineteenth century?
    11·2 answers
  • Which statement regarding the era of Reconstruction is FALSE
    5·2 answers
  • Why did most European powers show little resistance to letting their African colonies become independent
    11·1 answer
  • What time in your country
    10·2 answers
  • To government responses to the dustbowl were soil conservation efforts and
    10·1 answer
  • What were the effects of the Crusades?
    5·1 answer
  • PLZZ HELPP ILL GIVE BRAINLIST <br><br> 2. Define: Bill -
    8·1 answer
  • Please help if you’ve seen Rock IV :)
    12·1 answer
  • Is anyone willing to help me?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!