Yes, and I think it's B,too
Hope it helps.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be that it had "little-to-no effect" on trade, since gold and salt in fact allowed many of these kingdoms to profit greatly.</span></span>
One problem that the parliamentary systems that were set up by African nations had was that Those systems needed more time to evolve and work as intended.
<h3>Why did some African governments fail?</h3><h3 />
African nations mostly set up governments that were like the colonial governments that ruled them such as the British parliamentary system.
The problem with these system was that it needed time to work because it first had to be adapted to the unique characteristics of the nation.
Find out more on the parliamentary systems at brainly.com/question/470291.
#SPJ1
Answer:
Iraq invaded Iran on 22 September 1980, triggering a bitter eight-year war which destabilised the region and devastated both countries. The then Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein claimed as a reason for the invasion a territorial dispute over the Shatt al-Arab, the waterway which forms the boundary between the two countries.
Explanation:
The larger state, the more votes. If the state has a large population the state have more votes to give. The states vote as blocks. So if 51% of people vote for a candidate in a state it is if 100% votes for that candidate. <span> 9 states in America have nearly 60% of the US population. So without this system the whole race would only involve only those 9, and within those 9 only the massive cities they have. Ex. Chicago, New York, LA etc.</span>