Answer:
Manifest destiny was a widely held cultural belief in the 19th-century United States that American settlers were destined to expand across North America. Historians have emphasized that "manifest destiny" was a contested concept Democrats endorsed the idea but many prominent Americans (such as Abraham Lincoln, Ulysses S. Grant, and most Whigs) rejected it. Historian Daniel Walker Howe writes, "American imperialism did not represent an American consensus; it provoked bitter dissent within the national polity … Whigs saw America's moral mission as one of democratic example rather than one of conquest."
Explanation:
sorry po kung mali pa brainliest nalang po :D
Answer:
I think that the answer may be c
Answer:
Gandhi used a non-violent policy to fight the British and this influenced Martin Luther King.
Explanation:
Gandhi promoted the struggle for Indian independence against the British peacefully, without promoting any act of violence. This was very inspiring for King, who decided to take the same stand in his fight for civil rights, always claiming that Gandhi was the guide to the protests he promoted. King maintained the non-violent protests, even though he was the victim of several violent acts, as well as his followers.
Answer:
The artist is criticizing a big company for its use of foreign child slave labor/labor done in conditions analogous to slavery.
Explanation:
The situation criticized by the artist is that a big multinational company has its' products made in countries where labor laws give space to violent exploration of its workers. Nike has been accused of using sweatshops since the 70s because this makes its production cheaper.
Workers in the cartoon are Asian because Asian workers are the majority in this kind of labor market. The company in the cartoon, Nike, has been continuously accused of using sweatshops to produce its products. New accusations arose in 2017 when the United Students Against Sweatshops (USAS) realized a series of demonstrations against the company because of reports of sweatshops in Vietnam.
<span>Based on my research, Aristotle believes that his "Prime Mover" is God. He believed that everything that has happened, every "cause", had to have a cause before it. Something had to cause the first cause. However, the first cause can not be in the same formula or be part of the same equation. The rules of the first cause can not applied to the "causer" of the first cause. God has no beginning or end so time doesn't apply to God.</span>
