Answers:
1. Three problems associated with alcohol
a. High blood pressure
b. Liver and kidney disease or cancer
c. Heart diseases
2. “The direct answer to this question is that the government does not decide the legal status of drugs based on scientific assessment of potential for harm.
The ranking of drugs is a very interesting and controversial topic (subject to the apples and oranges problem), but it is simply not the basis by which governments make these decisions. The chart is worth analyzing, but it won't answer the question.
Practically speaking, making alcohol illegal is untenable. It was attempted in the United states in the 1920s, and I am not aware of any credible historians that consider prohibition to have been a success. Alcohol use has been present amongst humankind for millennia. It spans society, race, social class, etc. It does certainly present great potential for harm, individually through the detrimental health effects of abuse, and societally through the impact of impaired decision making, most notably drunk driving.
Despite that, alcohol also clearly provides some benefits that drive some people to use it. Others choose not to use it at all. Many use it without issue, and some develop problems. It is an effective social lubricant. In many cultures it is a common component of traditional celebrations, and in some cultures it is even a component of formal business interactions. It is one of the central rituals in the Catholic church.
Many of the problems associated with alcohol use can be reasonably mitigated without blanket prohibition, i.e. drunk driving and age restrictions. Many of the problems are also solved through basic social structures, in which friends and family address issues independently.
Given the above, the clear follow-on question is why these other, less harmful, drugs are illegal? If alcohol has demonstrated that it is actually more effective to manage these problems with regulation, how are other legalization decisions being made?
Those are much more complicated questions. The brief answers have to do with legacy (less history of widespread human use with other chemicals) and institutional racism.”
This is from the web so find details that will helped you and make sure to paraphrase!!
If helped mark me the brainiest!!
disable all websites that ask for locations
always go incognito (ctrl+shift+n)
always delete search history and website history
double check on all
FIrst of all You spelled HEIMLICH wrong..
<span>From behind, wrap your arms around the victim's waist.Make a fist and place the thumb side of your fist against the victim's upper abdomen, below the ribcage and above the navel.Grasp your fist with your other hand and press into their upper abdomen with a quick upward thrust. Do not squeeze the ribcage; confine the force of the thrust to your hands.Repeat until object is expelled.</span>
Answer:
The answer is age.
Explanation:
So for a 50-year-old, maximum heart rate is 220 minus 50, or 170 beats per minute.At a 50 percent exertion level, your target would be 50 percent of that maximum, or 85 beats per minute.
Answer:
Explanation:
According to my research on studies conducted by various medical professionals, I can say that based on the information provided within the question that the basal lamina is a specialized form of the extracellular matrix found beneath all epithelial tissues, which constitutes a large part of the basement membrane. The basal lamina can be found in many parts of the body including the skin, kidney, and even throughout the vascular system.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
