Answer:
C
Explanation:
FORMAT:
Author(s). "Title of Article." Title of Periodical, Day Month Year, pages.
Answer:
Boundless and bare
A second meaning or sound - alike word used to create humor.
Thunder and lightning will ruin a pool party, so the weather really isn't "great."
Explanation:
I'm not too sure for number one, but situational irony is basically saying that the situation makes the actions in it have the opposite effect. I'm pretty sure that boundless and bare is the right thing.
A pun is a joke that uses the multiple meanings of a word. The answer is a second meaning or sound - alike word used to create humor.
In verbal irony, the speaker intends to be understood as meaning something that is the opposite to the literal or usual meaning of what the speaker says. in this case, I think it's thunder and lightning will ruin a pool party, so the weather really isn't "great."
Answer:
21. False
22. False
Explanation:
The above are the correct answers.
Actually, ethos appeal doesn't use strong words to persuade or appeal to audience. Ethos appeal actually the credibility of a character to convince the audience.
It is actually pathos appeal that persuades audience by appealing to their emotions. Authors/speakers can actually use pathos to invoke a sympathy, feeling, love, etc. in their audience.
To be a master in the art of persuasion does not necessarily mean that one must use all three types of rhetorical appeal to persuade. Having mastery of one rhetorical appeal and knowing how to use it effectively will actually make one a master in the art of persuasion.
Answer:
I think it's correct answer A. is
I hope it's helpful for you...
Answer:
I believe school should not have clothing restrictions and let me tell you why .
I believe schools should not have rules of conduct regarding with clothing restrictions because one of many reasons .Firstly , numerous of kids in todayś society express their selves in clothing wear . The clothing can either vary from crop tops to easily being flip flops . However, we do have antagonists against this debation . Some people believe that clothing can be too revealing too others possibly even cause hazards as well . This debation puts a great argument in place .
Clothing wear is a expressive outlet too society today because it gives a chance for kids to be their selves . it is a fact that students who are against school uniforms argue that they lose their self-identity when they lose their right to express themselves through fashion. This proclaims the fact that kids can lose the ideal of expression because the school districts takes that away .
The other side of the argument believes that clothing can be hazardous or too revealing too others . In fact 1/3 school injuries have been caused by shoes not being sturdy enough . For example flip flops , and heels . This side does provide a good argument . However whoś side are you on ? who do you believe has a stronger argument.
This is all up for a debation , The argument still stands strong today. Do you believe that clothing restrictions should be lifted ? Or do you believe that they should be in use for protection of others ? You decide .
Explanation:
I hope I helped . I wrote this out of my own type . No plagrisim involved . I did it all on my own . You have a nice night or day . Xoxox.
