1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
raketka [301]
3 years ago
6

Which statement best explains why camp meetings helped churches attract more members in the first half of the 1800s?

History
1 answer:
katrin2010 [14]3 years ago
3 0

A.) The exciting camp meetings gave people more emotional involvement in religion than they had earlier.

I hope this helps!

You might be interested in
The most powerful leader in western europe during the early part of the middle ages was _______.
Eduardwww [97]
You could say the Church but Charlemagne was pretty huge 
8 0
3 years ago
Describe the lifestyle of the Creeks prior to the early 18th Century.
77julia77 [94]
It was a hard life for them.They tried to fit in and make life easier but that wasn't happening. They had so many battles to fight and fears to over come.But one thing for sure is that they never let each other down and they always stood but each others sides.
4 0
3 years ago
Using your economic knowledge and your research, compose a 350- to 450-word editorial that evaluates the effectiveness of these
NemiM [27]

Answer:

The benefits of trade agreements are not felt evenly by all industries in an economy. In fact, even member nations gain varying advantages by entering into trade agreements. However, despite these drawbacks, the United States continues to act on its commitment to free trade. In 2005, the United States signed a fair trade agreement (FTA) with Australia, and in 2012, it signed a trade protection agreement (TPA) with Colombia. Both agreements have been in force for a while. Now the question is, Have these agreements benefited the US economy? Let’s examine the impact of the bilateral agreements with Colombia and Australia on the US economy.

According to the USTR, the International Trade Commission (ITC) predicted that the United States–Colombia TPA would increase national GDP by $2.5 billion (Office of the US Trade Representative). Under the TPA, US exports to Colombia increased from $12.0 billion in 2010 to $18.3 billion in 2013 (US Department of State). The TPA seems to have delivered on its promise, because according to the USTR, US exports to Colombia increased by 30% in 2013 (Office of the US Trade Representative). So financially, Colombia is a lucrative market for the United States. However, the main opposition to the TPA stemmed from concerns about the terrible labor conditions in Colombia and the violent threats to those seeking to improve labor conditions in a country rife with crime. Although violence is a major concern, the FTA will eventually help both nations by bringing about social and labor reforms through economic activity. By helping Colombia become a peaceful country, the United States can pave the way for increased trade with Colombia in the future.

The United States–Australia FTA received considered opposition in both countries. US dairy farmers, ranchers, and small farmers were anxious about job losses resulting from the free entry of Australian products into the US market. However, if we judge by the boost in exports, the FTA has contributed to overall US economic growth. According to the USTR, in the first five years of the FTA, US exports to Australia increased by 33% (Office of the US Trade Representative). The FTA removed all tariffs on American imports into Australia, giving US exporters barrier-free entry into Australian markets.

The export industry plays a key role in driving economic growth and generating jobs in the United States. Colombia and Australia are two large and important markets for US exporters. The United States faces competition from other nations for access to these markets. By signing trade agreements, American goods can compete effectively in these markets. Although the agreements with Colombia and Australia are opposed for valid reasons, the agreements will benefit the US economy over time

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
What were the causes of the American Revolution
andrey2020 [161]
The British government decided to make the American<span> colonies pay a large share of the war debt from the French and Indian War. Through the Sugar Act, Stamp Act, and other taxes, the British tried to collect taxes that the </span>American<span> people considered harsh.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
When the name of a nation that is part of an acide ends in ite the acide name include the suffix?
tatyana61 [14]
When the name of an anion that is part of a salt ends in -ite, the acid name includes the suffix -ous acid.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 3. Why did Spanish settlers turn to African slaves to provide the labor for their American colonies? A. The Native American popu
    9·1 answer
  • What allowed specialization and division of labor in Mesopotamia
    15·2 answers
  • What was the benefit of sharing these new ideas with other scientists and philosophers​
    14·1 answer
  • Take a look at "Who Built the Pyramids? Now We Know!" How was the discovery of some tombs important to archaeologists' understan
    13·1 answer
  • Why was invading Russia a bad idea? (Napoleon Bonaparte)​
    6·1 answer
  • Why did new towns spring up in places that were not near rivers or canals?
    7·2 answers
  • Which of these happened FIRST, following the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand on June 28, 1914?
    5·2 answers
  • Wind and solar energy are examples of
    11·1 answer
  • Galileo was seen as a brilliant thinker during his own time, and he is still viewed this way today. Why do people give such high
    9·2 answers
  • Will give brainliest!! Answer the question above in at least 5 sentences. No copying and pasting from the internet !
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!