Answer: The same as the industry's demand curve
Explanation:
The demand curve faced by a non discriminating pure monopoly is same as the industry demand curve as, the monopoly facing the demand curve of the industry in the form of the downward sloping demand curve so that the monopolist increased its output demand. A non discriminating monopolist determined the demand curved and ultimately determined the price which are willing for pay.
Answer:
option. C. $50
Explanation:
Your loss is limited to $50 if you notify your financial institution within two business days after learning of the theft.
Answer:
The issue is whether Joe is liable to pay for Bob to Avarice Bank or not.
Joe should prevail.
Explanation:
The original contract is between bank and Bob and in that contract Joe is not involved. Secondly payment on someone' behalf always has to be a written contract.
According to UCC, suretyships have to be written for them to be enforceable. This is mentioned in Statute of Frauds. It clearly states that any gurantee by thrid party for payment of debts has to be in writing.
Answer:
They would need to buy $64,068.981 in U.S treasury bonds on Ava's second birthday to ultimately provide $120,000 for college expenses in 16 years.
Explanation:
The initial amount to be invested in order to yield $120,000 after 16 years can be expressed as;
F.V=P.V(1+R)^n
where;
F.V=future value of investment
P.V=present value of investment
R=annual interest rate
n=number of years
In our case;
F.V=$120,000
P.V=unknown
R=4%=4/100=0.04
n=16 years
replacing;
120,000=P.V(1+0.04)^(16)
120,000=P.V(1.04)^16
120,000=1.873 P.V
P.V=120,000/1.873
P.V=$64,068.981
They would need to buy $64,068.981 in U.S treasury bonds on Ava's second birthday to ultimately provide $120,000 for college expenses in 16 years.
It would be 610.32 . My teacher helped me with that one
