Sanctions are a type of trade restriction that is ineffective in forcing change in other countries.

1 answer:

3 0

<span>The answer to this question is False. Sanctions do not only rarely achieve their goal of forcing change in the targeted country, but they also tend to produce collateral economic damage in the nations that do apply them.</span>

You might be interested in

Suppose that in 2011, per-person GDP in Singapore was $53,591, and in Egypt, it was $5,547, as measured in 2005 purchasing power

Lyrx [107]

Answer:

a. There are significant differences in incomes between high- and low-income countries.

Explanation:

Data provided in the question

Per person GDP in Singapore = $53,591

Per person GDP in Egypt = $5,547

Based on the above information

As we can see that the level of income in Singapore is higher than Egypt also when there is an important difference in the high income and low income countries the same is shown accurately

hence, the correct option is a.

5 0

2 years ago

What explanation might an economist provide why some people overeat when such behavior can lead to health consequences? Some pe

LiRa [457]

Answer:

Utility overvalued

Explanation:

According to economists, such people over value the utility they are meant to get in the future. They only want to get the entire satisfaction at a go because of the fear of not getting that food again in the nearest future.

3 0

2 years ago

When workers negotiate as a group with employers, they are engaging in ____.

Jlenok [28]

Collective Bargaining

3 0

3 years ago

You buy a stock for which you expect to receive an annual dividend of $2.10 for the fifteen years that you plan on holding it. a

kap26 [50]

<span>You are given an annual dividend of $2.10 for the fifteen years that you plan on holding it. Also, after 15 years, you are given to sell the stock for $32.25. You are asked to find the present value of a share for this company if you want a 10% return. You have to mind that the future stock for 15 years is $32.25. You are not only going to mind the present value of the annuity at $2.10 but also the $32.25.

With the interest of r = 10% and number of years of n = 15, we get
PVIFA = 7.6061.

For annuity we have,
$2.10 * 7.60608 = $15.973

For $32.35 with r = 10% and n = 15
PVIF = 0.239392

Thus for the present value of selling price,
$32.25 * 0.239392 = $7.720

Thus the present value of the share
P = $15.973 + $7.720
P = $23.693
</span>

6 0

2 years ago

Elaina and Allen just purchased a home using a deed of trust. Which of the following is most likely true about their home loan

kozerog [31]

Elaina and Allen just purchased a home using a deed of trust: A trustee will keep the title in its most basic form until the debt is paid off. This is further explained below.

<h3>What is a deed of trust?</h3>

Generally, From the perspective of the lender, a deed of trust offers a significant advantage over a mortgage in a number of important respects. In the event that the borrower fails to make their required payments on the loan, the trustee has the authority to use their right to foreclose on the property on behalf of the beneficiary.

In conclusion, A deed of trust was used in the recent purchase of a property by Elaina and Allen. Until the mortgage debt is completely paid off, a trustee will retain the title in its simplest form.