Answer:
nature , nurture
Explanation:
The long held debate of nature vs nurture, arises from ancient philosopers and continues in the present. In the yaer of 1869 the issue was named "Nature versus Nurture" by Englishmen Francis Galton.
It was a time where the genotypes and clues of the existence of the DNA were emerging, and people where to observe if genetics shaped personality- or if in the contrary the cultural, social, and educational experiencies will be more important in personality formation.
There exists today a widespread consensus that, to certain degree, there will be always some natural components like the eye color and color of skin, that will however after birth be shaped by environmental factors and the lifestyle.
In the case of other internal characteristics, internal and external forces will shape as well.
Answer: Representative Ness Heuristic
Explanation: Representative Heuristic is usually employed when the need to make relatively quick decision occurs and therefore relying on the most readily available mental information to guide our decision. The representative Heuristic relies on using a prototype or something very synonymous to the observation or decision to be made. In most cases, decisions of this sort are usually incorrect. In the scenario above, the representative Heuristic was employed as the teachers perception or guess was guided by the direction from which the ball rolled. The direction of the ball was used as prototype which influenced the teacher's decision to conclude it was the boy on the same row.
Answer:
I. Viewing many television programs that associate successful males with football
III. Operant conditioning
IV. Gender schemata
Explanation:
As we can see in the question above, the boy contracted a very wrong custom of associating virility with his ability and taste for playing football. According to the boy, he is only manly and manly enough boys who like and know how to play football.
This thought (which is extremely wrong) occurs with the influence of some things. The first is the frequency with which this boy watches many television programs that show men, soccer players with a successful and well-established career.
The second influence is the result of operant conditioning, which is a psychological concept characterized by a form of learning that allows a person to associate a situation with a punishment. In this case, the boy associates the lack of skill and the lack of interest in football with words that cause embarrassment as punishment. For this reason, he calls his colleagues who don't like football "sissy".
The third influence occurs through gender schemes, which is a term used to describe the separation of things, activities and behavior as feminine and masculine, in addition to determining that only women can do what is considered feminine and only men can do what it's male. The boy associates football with masculinity and those who do not like or have no interest in football are feminine, effeminate and not men.
Hmmm. Transitory? Im stumped.
Answer:
class inclusion.
Explanation:
Class inclusion: In psychology, the term "class inclusion" was discovered by one of the famous psychologists named Jean Piaget and is described as an individual's or students' capability of classifying different objects into two or more than two categories at the same time. It is often denoted as a child's mastery related to the "structure of hierarchical classification" by Jean Piaget.
In the question above, the given statement demonstrates that Andrew understands the concept of class inclusion.
