Answer:
The answer is "A"
Explanation:
Cumulative interests are counted by one plus the annual interest rate adjusted to the cumulative periods of less than one. The first principal sum is determined by one. The cumulative sum of the initial loan is then deducted from the calculation.
Formula:
That's why we apply the above formula to calculate the annual interest rate.
Answer:
a. People are hard-wired to feel emotions about a situation before they reason it out.
Explanation:
Emotional hijacking occurs when our brain's emotional processor (amygdala) bypasses our normal reasoning process.
This occurrence in terms of an emergency is a self-defence mechanism when it is necessary to act in the face of perceived danger.
Emotional hijacking occurs when there is a compulsive need to complete and action. For example answering an email, answering the phone.
It is possible to control emotional hijacking through emtional intelligence.
Answer: Work in process
Explanation:
The work in process is basically refers to the work in the progress that helps in process the production of the products and the services.
The work in process is basically refers to the process inventory system that helps in managing the accounting period and also the cost is basically assigned for the inventory valuation.
According to the given question, the work in process is supported by the cost ledger that manages all the services with the client in the company. Therefore, Work in process is the correct answer.
Therefore, Work in process is the correct answer.
Answer:
1. The disagreement between these economists is most likely due to
a. differences in values
2. Despite their differences, with which proposition are two economists chosen at random most likely to agree?
a. Lawyers make up an excessive percentage of elected officials.
Explanation:
Economists chosen at random do not usually agree on economic events and realities, instead, they are more likely to agree on issues that are not economic. They offer differing opinions based on similar principles. Most of their disagreements stem from differences in what they place their values on. Some value market-oriented approaches while others value government interventions in market situations, with other variants in-between.
