1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
harina [27]
3 years ago
13

What geographic feature is indicated by #8?

History
1 answer:
Otrada [13]3 years ago
7 0

Dhsjsjfbfbsnsnfncusiwj

Explanation:

haha dvfvdyussu

You might be interested in
One-third of the planet���s land area is used for what purpose?
aev [14]
One-third of the planet’s land area is used for agriculture
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLS HELPPPP!
ad-work [718]

Answer:

"Many African Americans in the South were elected to Congress and state legislatures." is the correct answer.

Explanation:

The passing of the 14th and 15th amendment drastically increased African Americans rights and granted them the ability to hold a position in office.

6 0
3 years ago
True or False. In the 1800's, Americans moved east and formed new states.<br><br>•TRUE<br>•FALSE​
UkoKoshka [18]

Answer:

That is true. Hope it helps.

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are two alliance groups are known as?
FinnZ [79.3K]
The alliance system was made up of two groups, the Central powers (Germany, Austria- Hungary, Italy(1914), and Turkey). The second group was the Allied powers (Russia, France, Great Britain, and United states).
8 0
3 years ago
What did the Supreme Court decide in the case of Mapp v. Ohio? A. Police should inform suspects of their right to remain silent
SCORPION-xisa [38]

In <em>Mapp v. Ohio</em>, the Supreme Court ruled <u>B. If the police</u> violate the law to obtain evidence, they cannot use that evidence against an accused person in court.

<h3>What was the place of evidence in the case of Mapp v. Ohio?</h3>

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled against the state in a 5-3 vote, favoring Mapp, from whom evidence was obtained without due process.

The implication is that evidence seized unlawfully from a suspect or an accused, without a search warrant, could not be used in criminal prosecutions in state courts.

Thus, in <em>Mapp v. Ohio</em>, the Supreme Court ruled <u>B. If the police</u> violate the law to obtain evidence, they cannot use that evidence against an accused person in court.

Learn more about the importance of evidence in criminal prosecutions at brainly.com/question/7802791

#SPJ1

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • 1. Who were the Indian National Congress and what did they do?
    8·1 answer
  • Which three factors were part of European imperialism??
    6·2 answers
  • What is the significance of the date of this cartoon? What is the name and nationality of the cartoonist? Explain their signific
    14·1 answer
  • What new country lies south of austria and hungry and north allania
    14·1 answer
  • The establishment of permanent agricultural communities marked the beginning of what?
    7·2 answers
  • James madison wrote about his concerns regarding factions in the federalist 10 true or false
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following powers does the president have
    11·1 answer
  • Colonists founded Savannah because the site had
    7·2 answers
  • identify and explain progressive responses to the political, economic or social effects of industrialization.
    10·1 answer
  • 20 POINTS PLZ HELP!!! Which of these was not one of the low-wage jobs Irish immigrants often took after arriving in the United S
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!