Answer:
Proved
Step-by-step explanation:
Given: EC || AC, DB || AC, ∠A = ∠F
Prove: ΔMDF ∼ ΔNCA
Solution
See diagram attached to the solution to better understand the following workings.
Redrawing ΔMDF or rotating to be facing the same direction.
EC is parallel to AC
DB parallel to AC
Using similar triangle theorem:
If ΔMDF ∼ ΔNCA
Ratio of Corresponding sides would be equal
(adjacent of ΔMDF)/(adjacent of ΔNCA) = (Opposite of ΔMDF)/(opposite of ΔNCA) = (hypotenuse of ΔMDF)/(hypotenuse of ΔNCA)
DF/ CA = MD/NC = FM/AN
∠A = ∠F
∠M = ∠N
∠D = ∠C
Since the ratio of Corresponding sides and angle are equal, ΔMDF is similar to ΔNCA.
ΔMDF ∼ ΔNCA
Answer:
(x − 6i) (x + 6i)
Step-by-step explanation:
Using real numbers, x² + 36 is already simplified.
Using imaginary numbers:
x² + 36
x² − 36i²
(x − 6i) (x + 6i)
Answer:
15 mL of the solution with 20% water will be needed.
Step-by-step explanation:
Use the inverse relationship
10 mL * (18-15)% = x mL * (20-18)%
x = 10 mL * (3/2) = 15 mL
Answer: legislative risk
Step-by-step explanation:
Legislative risk refers to a form of risk whereby there's likelihood of a business making a loss on an investment due to governmental action.
Legislative risk implies an amendment or an abolition of laws which has a direct impact on investments. Regarding the question, the introduction of the new tax laws and fiscal policies is a legislative risk.
