Hi. sorry, not trying to take away points, but I’m not sure if this is supposed to be a question, or a statement?
Answer:
No, it shouldn't. In the present case, it is a conflict of interest between two states: the states of New York and New Jersey, with respect to Ellis Island and the inter-jurisdictional waters of the Hudson River. Therefore, due to being a controversial matter between two states, the provisions of Article III Section 2 of the United States Constitution, which establishes the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in the case. In addition, in case of recourse to the internal courts of a state, a state would be brought to litigate outside its original jurisdiction.
Answer:
able to be represented by a straight line on a graph; involving or exhibiting directly proportional change in two related quantities.
Explanation:
Answer:
C. Under the clause, states may not discriminate against citizens of other states in the buying and selling of property.
Explanation:
The Privileges and Immunities clause is found in Article IV of the United States Constitution and it prevents the states to treat in a discriminatory manner to citizens of other states. It also does not contain a market participation exception so, when the State acts as a supplier like in the case of selling or buying properties according to this clause it is forbidden to discriminate non-residents.
I hope this answer helps you.
