1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
timofeeve [1]
3 years ago
15

Cloward and ohlin argued that some people have greater access to illegal opportunities than other people. True or false?

Law
1 answer:
alexira [117]3 years ago
6 0
True in some cases, however law enforcement personnel will punish anyone, under certain circumstances it is much easier to do illegal activities, such as if someone were to have a dad as a cop they can get away without a speeding ticket etc.
You might be interested in
What is bail and how does it work? (4-5 sentences)
qwelly [4]

Answer:

I'm not in law school, but...

Explanation:

Bail is basically when court says than give me some deposit so I know you ain't running away. In essence it's a guarantee by someone that during the time they bail you, you won't escape.

(Don't know hot to make it longer)

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. While driving in urban situations,
Gekata [30.6K]

Answer:

1. keep your vehicle close to others.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which sentence from the article supports the MAIN idea of the article? On Law Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dies at
Sedaia [141]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

I would want to believe A, Ginsburg was a women's rights champion and the court's second female justice., is the answer because it explains more about the person in question, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, that is.

While the other options were more about what she said or did, A in particular is talking about who Ruth is, and even went as much as listing an accolade of hers, that she's the court's second female justice.

So, I go with A

4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is true about the Bill of Rights?
Colt1911 [192]

Answer:

Its A

Explanation:

Your welcome :)

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In order for a plaintiff to win a case involving intentional infliction of emotional distress, she must prove the defendant acte
Ratling [72]

Answer:

False

Explanation:

If she proves that she committed a crime and went against the law that is enough. Nothing to much more than that matters.

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which Supreme Court case held that an officer may search a suspect to protect
    5·1 answer
  • The law relating to the employment relationship is based on the traditional law called master and servant, which evolved into th
    15·1 answer
  • How could the Commerce Clause of the Constitution apply to medical marijuana? And why does the owner believe it does not apply t
    5·2 answers
  • Pretty rare of me to ask but, If you were in a store but it went on lock down because someone dangerous was in the building what
    7·2 answers
  • Why might jurors struggle to reach a verdict? (Include 3 reasons)
    10·2 answers
  • List the four ways to become a business owner.
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following can be a consequence of noncompliance with EEOC
    14·2 answers
  • 3. Compare and contrast the beginnings, jurisdiction and duties of State courts (Ch. 4) and Federal Courts (Ch. 3)?
    12·1 answer
  • When my sister does not listen to me
    8·2 answers
  • How can people demonstrate their understanding of the responsibilities duties and obligations of citizenship
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!