I believe the answer is
B. This pamphlet calmly disputed the claims that had been made in favor of slavery and provided ordinary citizens and abolitionists with arguments explaining why slavery was wrong.
Answer:
Normally living with an extended family have many positive effects on the well-being of children because living with someone that you could trust and who will take care of the children without their parents inside the house can really give the assurance to the parents that their children will grow with a normal life In an extended family household the adults can share their worries, stresses and responsibilities with other family members like their parents, who genuinely care for their wellbeing. This often forms a close family support structure which in turn reduces individual stress and promotes happiness. Living in an extended family provides constant care for children and support for other members of the family as well. ... Being able to rely on not only two parents but grandparents, aunts, uncles, brothers, and sisters helps to create a support system which in turn brings families closer together.
Explanation:
Answer:
Parable of the Sower maintains themes of growth and change. The characters, lead by Lauren Olamina, wrestle with how to create an ideal future, especially when the past and present aren't exactly desirable. Through Lauren's created religion called “Earthseed,” the text's themes of growth and change are evident.
Explanation:
Mark brainlist if you want and leave an thanks
The answer is C: He realizes that Barbara is an innocent woman.
(just took the quiz)
Answer:
Some people are worried about the equipment that people use for the Paralympic Games because they are worried the prosthetic legs may give the runner an advantage. The text says that technology has improved a lot, so some of the artificial legs that people use may be able to run faster than what the wearer can naturally run.
As for the last part, I will give you my opinion to help but I encourage you to try to think of your own because you know this is an opinion thing and everyone is different.
I think that leaders should make a change, because like the text said, single amputees might feel discouraged from entering the running competitions because they know that the double amputees potentially have an advantage. It would basically be like cheating. The leaders should do a background check of what the double amputees are using, so that they know the artificial legs only allow the person to run at the speed they are naturally capable of
