How many square meters of brick pavements must be laid out for a 4 meter wide walk around a circular flower bed 22 meters wide i
2 answers:
You might be interested in
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
[...] if you can write the LHS as a perfect square, or if you can't spot a factorization of it right away, if and only if the discriminant (or, if b is an even number, 1/4 of it) is zero.
<u>I see it! I see it!</u>
Stare at it for a while. First term is , third term is
, we are missing a double product, but we can play with k. For the LHS to be
you just need
.
<u>I don't see it...</u>
Then number crunching it is. Set the discriminant to 0, solve for k
We know that
<span>a) the slope-intercept form of the line---------------> y=mx+b
b) </span><span>if two lines are parallel both have the same slope
</span>then
<span>passes through the point (1,0) and is parallel to x-y=7
Step 1
Find the slope
</span>x-y=7------------> y=x-7------------> m=1
Step 2
Find the slope-intercept form of the line---> y=mx+b
point (1,0) m=1
0=(1)*(1)+b------> b=-1
y=(1)*x-1--------> y=x-1
the answer is
y=x-1
using a graph tool
see the attached figure
<span>a) the slope-intercept form of the line---------------> y=mx+b
b) </span><span>if two lines are parallel both have the same slope
</span>then
<span>passes through the point (1,0) and is parallel to x-y=7
Step 1
Find the slope
</span>x-y=7------------> y=x-7------------> m=1
Step 2
Find the slope-intercept form of the line---> y=mx+b
point (1,0) m=1
0=(1)*(1)+b------> b=-1
y=(1)*x-1--------> y=x-1
the answer is
y=x-1
using a graph tool
see the attached figure
The first thing to do is to get the graph. That's below. That is a very wicked looking graph. I'm not sure what happens at 0. I'm not sure it is continuous at 0. That's something to make a fuss over because x = 0 is one of the x intercepts.
y = - x^(2/5)(x(5/5) + 7).
y = - x^(2/5)(x + 7)
So one of the x intercepts is 0 and the other one is -7.
The reasons are known because the factors can be equated to 0. It does not look to me like there is exact symmetry. There is a local minimum however at what the graph says is (-2,-6.5 or so)
You could differentiate that to find the exact point, but you are not asked for that.
So the domain is from -∞ to zero and 0 to plus ∞ I think you have to exclude 0 even though it is an x intercept.
The graph decreases from -∞ < x < -2
It increases from -2 < x < 0
It decreases form 0< x < ∞
y = - x^(2/5)(x(5/5) + 7).
y = - x^(2/5)(x + 7)
So one of the x intercepts is 0 and the other one is -7.
The reasons are known because the factors can be equated to 0. It does not look to me like there is exact symmetry. There is a local minimum however at what the graph says is (-2,-6.5 or so)
You could differentiate that to find the exact point, but you are not asked for that.
So the domain is from -∞ to zero and 0 to plus ∞ I think you have to exclude 0 even though it is an x intercept.
The graph decreases from -∞ < x < -2
It increases from -2 < x < 0
It decreases form 0< x < ∞