All categories

3 years ago

PLEEEAASSE ANSWER <3 63÷(−9)=?

Mathematics

2 answers:

beks73 [17]3 years ago

5 0

Yes 7 is correct because

lyudmila [28]3 years ago

4 0

Answer: 7

Step-by-step explanation: All you have to do is use absolute value when a number is closed in so you would say 63 divided by positive 9 = 7

You might be interested in

I need to do these factor trees for 60 and 96

Arisa [49]

60
2 and 30
30
2 and 15
15
3 and 5
96
8 and 12
circle for 8 is 2 and the square is 4
circle for 12 is 2 and the last circle is also 2

7 0

3 years ago

How do I find the property of 34+0+18+26

AlladinOne [14]

We have to check which of PEMDAS rules can be applied in this case. We have only ADDITION. In this case we can observe that addition is:
1. Associative $(34+0+18)+26 = 34+(0+18+26)$
2. Commutative $34 + 0 + 18+ 26 = 26 + 18 + 34 + 0$
3. has Additive property $34 +0 = 34$

8 0

3 years ago

How many sixteenths are there in 7/8

umka2103 [35]

Answer:

14/16

Step-by-step explanation:

If you multiply 8 by 2 you get 16 so multiply 7 by 2 and you get 14/16

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

I not sure what it is? Thank you to who ever help me

Vadim26 [7]

I think b I might be wrong

8 0

3 years ago

Assume {v1, . . . , vn} is a basis of a vector space V , and T : V ------> W is an isomorphism where W is another vector spac

Degger [83]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

To prove that $w_1,\dots w_n$ form a basis for W, we must check that this set is a set of linearly independent vector and it generates the whole space W. We are given that T is an isomorphism. That is, T is injective and surjective. A linear transformation is injective if and only if it maps the zero of the domain vector space to the codomain's zero and that is the only vector that is mapped to 0. Also, a linear transformation is surjective if for every vector w in W there exists v in V such that T(v) =w

Recall that the set $w_1,\dots w_n$ is linearly independent if and only if the equation

$\lambda_1w_1+\dots \lambda_n w_n=0$ implies that

$\lambda_1 = \cdots = \lambda_n$ .

Recall that $w_i = T(v_i)$ for i=1,...,n. Consider $T^{-1}$ to be the inverse transformation of T. Consider the equation

$\lambda_1w_1+\dots \lambda_n w_n=0$

If we apply $T^{-1}$ to this equation, then, we get

$T^{-1}(\lambda_1w_1+\dots \lambda_n w_n) =T^{-1}(0) = 0$

Since T is linear, its inverse is also linear, hence

$T^{-1}(\lambda_1w_1+\dots \lambda_n w_n) = \lambda_1T^{-1}(w_1)+\dots + \lambda_nT^{-1}(w_n)=0$

which is equivalent to the equation

$\lambda_1v_1+\dots + \lambda_nv_n =0$

Since $v_1,\dots,v_n$ are linearly independt, this implies that $\lambda_1=\dots \lambda_n =0$ , so the set $\{w_1, \dots, w_n\}$ is linearly independent.

Now, we will prove that this set generates W. To do so, let w be a vector in W. We must prove that there exist $a_1, \dots a_n$ such that

$w = a_1w_1+\dots+a_nw_n$

Since T is surjective, there exists a vector v in V such that T(v) = w. Since $v_1,\dots, v_n$ is a basis of v, there exist $a_1,\dots a_n$ , such that

$a_1v_1+\dots a_nv_n=v$

Then, applying T on both sides, we have that

$T(a_1v_1+\dots a_nv_n)=a_1T(v_1)+\dots a_n T(v_n) = a_1w_1+\dots a_n w_n= T(v) =w$

which proves that $w_1,\dots w_n$ generate the whole space W. Hence, the set $\{w_1, \dots, w_n\}$ is a basis of W.

Consider the linear transformation $T:\mathbb{R}^2\to \mathbb{R}^2$ , given by T(x,y) = T(x,0). This transformations fails to be injective, since T(1,2) = T(1,3) = (1,0). Consider the base of $\mathbb{R}^2$ given by (1,0), (0,1). We have that T(1,0) = (1,0), T(0,1) = (0,0). This set is not linearly independent, and hence cannot be a base of $\mathbb{R}^2$

8 0

3 years ago