Answer:
Constitution is the answer
For the Federalists, their <u>most likely response</u> is D. They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals.
<h3>Who were the Federalists?</h3>
The Federalists were American Founding Fathers who wanted a strong government and strong executive branch.
The Federalists were opposed by the anti-Federalists who wanted a weaker central government.
The Federalists did not vote for a bill of rights because they regarded the constitution as sufficient, unlike the anti-Federalists who demanded a bill of rights to be part of the Constitution.
Thus, for the Federalists, their <u>most likely response</u> is D. They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals.
Learn more about Federalists and Anti-Federalists at brainly.com/question/267094
#SPJ1
To some leaders, lawmaking was more efficient and faster when debated and voted for in only one chamber,as provided for in an unicameral legislature. This made the law responsive to changes in public opinion, involving them in the law making and amendment process. This therefore advocates for the availability of democracy in any particular society,creating more democratic governments.
Answer:
There should be no limits on owning and using guns.
Explanation:
The Second Amendment was added to the constitution to protect people's right to keep and bear arms and the government's right to establish a Militia for the defense of the nation. Therefore, "There should be no limits on owning and using guns" is the statement that best interprets the statute because the statute is not specific enough, it can be broadly understood that since people have the right to own arms for self-defense, they also have the right to use them when there is a threat to their security.
The amendment states: <em>A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, </em><em>the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.</em>
He used his wealth to help flourish
