The question is kind of vague in my opinion.
the best measurement to report with the scale in my opinion would be tens of pounds. my reasoning is because the decimal place would still prove importance with numbers under one hundred. above one hundred pounds and the decimal place becomes kind of pointless.
I hope I answered your question. though i'm sorry if i didn't
First get the factors of 24: 2*2*2*3Then the factors of 9: 3*3 Comparing the factors, the GCF is 3 Then you can rewrite the expression: 3*8 + 3*3 At this point, I'm not sure whether what you mean is really distributive property or not since this case is more of a factoring. 3*(8+3)
Check the picture.
let the length of a side of each of the squares removed be x.
The box formed will have dimensions: 80-2x, 50-2x, x(the height)
So the volume can be expressed as a function of x as follows:
f(x)=(80-2x)(50-2x)x=
![[4000-160x-100x+4 x^{2} ]x=(4 x^{2}-260x+4000)x](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B4000-160x-100x%2B4%20x%5E%7B2%7D%20%5Dx%3D%284%20x%5E%7B2%7D-260x%2B4000%29x)
so

the solutions of f'(x)=0 gives the inflection points, so the candidates for maxima points,

solving the quadratic equation, either by a calculator, graphing software, or by other algebraic methods as the discriminant formula, we find the solutions
x=10 and x=33.333
plug in f(x) these values to see which greater:

cm cubed

which is negative because (50-66.666)<0
Answer: 18000 cm cubed
Answer:
x=3
Step-by-step explanation:
15 – 2x=3x
Add 2x to each side
15 – 2x+2x=3x+2x
15 = 5x
Divide each side by 5
15/5 = 5x/5
3 =x
Answer:
3) 
4)
Step-by-step explanation:
distance between two points:

we have:
3) (6, -2), (8, -3)




so we have:

4) (7,-8), (-8, 2)




