1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
shusha [124]
3 years ago
8

The treaty that ended the war was called the Treaty of .

History
2 answers:
miv72 [106K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The treaty that ended the war was called the Treaty of Versailles.

Hope this helps!!

Bapi
2 years ago
Paris
juin [17]3 years ago
5 0
I’m pretty sure it was The Treaty of Versailles



Hope it helps you :).
Bapi
2 years ago
Paris if its wrong
You might be interested in
What three times did Nixon clashed with congress?
BigorU [14]

Answer:

facts about 1973 Nixon Press Confrence video and transcriptfacts about 1973 Nixon Press Confrence video and transcriptfacts about 1973 Nixon Press Confrence video and transcriptfacts about 1973 Nixon Press Confrence video and transcript

click here

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
8.1.2 Excam Semester Exam
koban [17]
D is correct, as the constitution specified responsibilities allotted to federal and state governments. All other answers are true for both kinds of relationships.
6 0
3 years ago
How did the sedentary lifestyle of agricultural Indian tribes promote higher birthrates.<br>​
aev [14]

Answer:

aHBfhkwkbf sabubus

Explanation:

hjsbbfhsfehfus

4 0
3 years ago
Who was prime minister of england during world war ii?
lidiya [134]
Winston Churchill was the prime minister during ww2
4 0
3 years ago
(NEED HELP) In this assignment, you will write a three- to four-paragraph Supreme Court opinion for
liberstina [14]

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, Diane D. Kirstein, U .S. Attorney's Office, San Antonio, TX, Plaintiff–Appellee. Laura G. Greenberg, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Bradford W. Bogan, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Maureen Scott Franco, Federal Public Defender, M. Carolyn Fuentes, Federal Public Defender's Office, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant–Appellant.

In this case, we must decide whether the district court's imposition of a condition of supervised release prohibiting the defendant from “residing or going to places where a minor or minors are known to frequent without prior approval of the probation officer” was plainly erroneous. We conclude it was not and AFFIRM.

I.

In January 1990, Michael Fields was convicted in Wisconsin state court of second degree sexual assault of a child.1 He was sentenced to five years in prison, but only served one year; the rest of his term was probated. Fields was required to register as a sex offender in Wisconsin for the rest of his life. Because of this conviction, he must also register as a sex offender in Texas. Fields has thrice been arrested and convicted for failing to register as a sex offender.2 He has also been repeatedly told by state authorities in both Wisconsin and Texas that he must register as a sex offender, instructions with which it appears he has never complied.3

Fields was arrested by the Austin Police Department for failing to register as a sex offender in April 2013. The next month, he was indicted in federal court and charged with one count of failing to register as a sex offender in violation of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA”).4 After unsuccessfully moving to dismiss the indictment on the grounds that SORNA was unconstitutional, Fields pled guilty in July 2013.

In November 2013, Fields appeared before the district court for his sentencing hearing. At that hearing, the court reviewed Fields's criminal history record, and concluded that, even discounting several convictions where it was disputed as to whether Fields committed the crime, he had “a solid criminal record since 1974.” After hearing from counsel, the court then sentenced Fields to a 27–month sentence of imprisonment, followed by ten years of supervised release. The supervision included a number of conditions, including, as relevant here, a requirement that:

The defendant shall follow all other lifestyle restrictions or treatment requirements imposed by the therapist, and continue those restrictions as they pertain to avoiding risk situations throughout the course of supervision. This includes not residing or going to places where a minor or minors are known to frequent without prior approval of the probation officer.

Fields did not object to this condition. This timely appeal follows.

II.

We normally review conditions of supervised release for abuse of discretion.5 In this case, because Fields did not object to his supervised release condition while before the district court, we review for plain error.6 As the Supreme Court has made clear, plain error is a demanding standard:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who in government took the lead in extending gay rights in the early 2000s?
    8·1 answer
  • Based on the two articles you have read, how might the federal government
    14·1 answer
  • How did events during World War II lay the groundwork for African Americans to fight for civil rights in the 1950’s? (I don't wa
    12·1 answer
  • Nations involved in the six day war?
    13·1 answer
  • What had the Great Pyramid built as a monument to his greatness
    10·1 answer
  • A typical passage through the panama canal takes how long? 2 4 hours 8 10 hours 2 4 days 8 10 days
    13·2 answers
  • The Chinese territories of Macau and Hong Kong
    9·2 answers
  • Which of the following included a tax on official documents?
    6·2 answers
  • Why was John F. Kennedy killed? (if there's not a confirmed answer what are some of the theories of why he was killed?)
    9·1 answer
  • Describe Tornadoes, And what causes this type of hazardous weather?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!