Answer:
This is
Explanation:
The exciting combination of sight and sound conjures up visions of dragons roaring proudly, breathing fire, and flying through the midnight sky. Determined to find out if dragons really could have existed, I set out on a factual search.
Scientists presented evidence to show why dragons couldn't and did not exist. They said that if dragons had lived, someone would have found remains somewhere in the world.
I noticed that all cultures around the world described dragons in a similar way. I found notes on dragons in old legal documents and in the travel diaries of people like Marco Polo. Dragons are included along with eleven royal animals.
If you create stomach gas like birds do, you could create enough to lift yourself off the ground. If you expel air while diving towards land, it could release gases that could ignite. When the animal died, the stomachs would release strong acids that would dissolve its corpse over time.
Some will believe with all their hearts that legendary creatures roamed our ancient world. I'm not sure which side to believe, but the sound and fury of a night like this make me smile.
Your question is incomplete because you have not provided the answer options, which are:
exhibit grace under pressure.
recognize the meaningless of life.
have a mentor to follow.
learn from his mistakes.
Answer:
exhibit grace under pressure.
Explanation:
In the excerpt from Hemingway's "A Farewell to Arms," the narrator makes reference to how soldiers spend their time before an attack. In that respect, he mentions that he is invited to have a drink with the major and other officers in a kind and pleasant atmosphere. Thus, the relaxed and unconcerned moment they have contrasts with the brutality of the attacks, which demonstrates the dignity and amiability of the men in stressful times.
Clegg’s twisting of the truth (for example, “What I’m trying to say is that having her as my guest happened suddenly, it wasn’t something I planned the moment the money came”), as soon as he wins the money, he moves to London and sets out to transform his “observations” into the entrapment of Miranda, the “rarity” he has decided to collect and keep as his own.
The advice that Ophelia receives from her brother Laertes is extremely different from the advice her father Polonius gives her. Laertes gently reminds Ophelia that Hamlet might really love her, but since he is in line for the throne he and might not actually be able to choose his wife for himself. He warns her to keep her affection "Out of the shot and danger of desire," meaning to not give in to her desires, otherwise she might ruin herself for future potential husbands. Polonius' advice is a little bit more aggressive. He scolds Ophelia for giving Hamlet too much attention, and says that there is no way Hamlet actually loves her. He says that his vows she "<span>must not take for fire", meaning she should not take his words for true passion. The overall difference between Laertes and Polonius is that Laertes is much gentler, and believes Hamlet might actually have feelings for her right now, and Polonius is putting more blame on Ophelia, saying there is no way Hamlet actually likes her.
</span>
The writer should include mainly a summary of what has been covered in the narration, including all the main points and tying them together to see how they relate to each other and making conclusions about the results and observations and activities mentioned in the narrative so that the reader can see what the lessons learned are from the story or process or scientific enquiry carried out.
