<span>The answer is Gabriela Mistral. :)
</span>
It really depends on the issues you are talking about. When it comes to basic human rights like life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness I would say yes. However, I don’t hunk they were talking about equality in the lgbt+ community, aborti*n, or gun control. Hope this helped
In diversity of citizenship cases, if a case involves multiple plaintiffs with separate and distinct claims must satisfy the jurisdictional amount.
Diversity jurisdiction is a type of subject-matter jurisdiction recognized by U.S. law that enables federal courts to hear disputes without a federal question at issue.
There are two requirements that must be satisfied for a U.S. federal court to have diversity jurisdiction over a case.
The plaintiffs must be citizens of different U.S. states than the defendants, which is known as "diversity of citizenship," between the parties. Second, the "amount in controversy" in the case must exceed $75,000.
These two requirements must be met for a lawsuit to be considered in a federal court in the United States, unless it raises a federal issue in which case it must be heard in state court.
Learn more about diversity here:
brainly.com/question/14696671
#SPJ4
World War I lasted from 28 July 1914 to 11 November 1918 while World War II lasted from 1939 to 1945.
Explanation:
World war I : The First World War is primarily called the Great War prevailing in Europe from 1914 to 1918. This great war was fought in Europe, Asia and Africa on three continents and sea, earth and sky.
Militarism, Alliances, Imperialism and Nationalism were four causes of WWI
World War II : Germany, Italy, and Japan—and the Allies—France, Great Britain, the United States, the Soviet Union, and, to a lesser extent, China. Treaty of Versailles. The Treaty of Versailles ended World War I between Germany and the Allied Powers, Japanese Expansion, Fascism, Hitler and the Nazi Party, Appeasement, Great Depression were the causes of WWII.
<span>Unfortunately,
they are immense machines, expensive to move and store, difficult to
test, complex to maintain, and far from secure against vote fraud. Furthermore, a lever voting machine maintains no audit trail. With paper ballots, a it is possible to recount the votes if there is an allegation of fraud.</span>
