Answer: client's competency to stand trial.
Explanation: The client's competency refers to the client's state of mind during the criminal proceedings. In order to be competent to stand trial, the client must be able to understand the legal proceedings they are facing and the technicalities. Also, part of the competence is linked to the client's ability to work with the attorney and assist in their own defense. The competence statutes is paramount because it protects people's rights - it's not ethical for a person who can't understand the proceedings go before a judge and enter a plea of any kind.
Base from the advice that has been given to them, it is considered to be a good advice. It is because being able to be distracted means that the person could have more time to think about their decisions. With that, it could help them to be able to come up with the decision that they think would be best for them. That is why the advice that has given to them is a good advice.
Marbury v. Madison was what established judicial review.
The correct answer is B) The cognitive process of critically evaluating disciplinary insights and creating common ground among them to construct a more comprehensive understanding.
That is a good definition of interdisciplinary integration.
What is going to happen here is that the new understanding would be the product of the evaluation of these disciplines that come to strengthen the knowledge and is the result of the integrative process.
This interdisciplinary integration is going to be useful to synthesize concepts and information needed to improve the quality and focus of research or any investigative project.
Answer:
tbh I think it's C.
Explanation:
A or B doesn't make much sense to me. The most important reason consumers would want free trade doesn't apply to D so what's left is C. Sorry if I'm wrong, just trying to help out.
