Including fallacies in advertising can be effective but dangerous at the same time. For example, aspirins are advertised through telling people that if they feel tired when they get up in the morning, they should take an aspirin so that they can face the day. This may be effective because a lot of people work long hours and feel naturally tired. Besides, they turn on the TV when they get back home in the evening and see these sorts of commercials. They will believe in them since they will have to get up and go to work the following day. However, this may be dangerous because people can develop addiction to drugs.
In my opinion, we should not believe in advertisements. The fact that people feel tired because of their work is a real problem. We can feel identified with that problem but the solution cannot be an aspirin. The advertisement shows us the problem but the solution is dangerous; our health is affected. If our health is the problem, we should see our doctor. Doctors will give us true facts. As a result, we will become better consumers because we will take from the market what is really good for us and we will not believe just in anything. For example , we will just believe in advertisments that show the good effects of eating healthy food and doing exercises.
The Wizard used tricks to fool Dorothy and her friends.
Answer:
Atticus says that Bob Ewell must be crazy to attack Jem and scout, it is the only explanation he could think of that will justify a man to attack innocent children.
Heck Tate disagrees and says Bob Ewell was just mean and had enough liquor in him to make him brave enough to attack children, implying that he was a coward.
Of the two, Heck Tate's explanation is the most correct and the one that aligns with how I feel about Bob Ewell.
Explanation:
Atticus cannot understand what could possibly make a man want to kill children unless the man is mad, so he says Bob Ewell was crazy.
Heck Tate however, assures him that Bob Ewell was not crazy but just "mean as hell" and a coward on top of that, so his attack on the children was inevitable.
Heck Tate's explanation is the correct one.
