I believe the answer is: that will increase their well-being.
during the process, people would weight in the magnitude of benefit that they would obtain from doing a certain action compared to the expense and opportunities they need to sacrifice to obtain it. If the benefit is larger than the sacrifice, then people would see their action to be rational or purposeful
Well if you want to know how it would be not very effective there you go
The Dual Use Dilemma refers to uncertainty on how to prevent misuse of scientific breakthroughs.
<h3><u>Explanation: </u></h3>
The Dual Use Dilemma is a general dilemma in the scientific community that arises whenever a scientific breakthrough happens that can be weaponized by hostile entities in order to be used as a force of evil.
The dual use refers to the technology obtained from the breakthrough being used to fulfill its intended purpose of helping the general population, while it may be used as a weapon as well, thus the dual use dilemma. Scientists think that preventive measures would only lead to impeding the scientific progress of the concept, which leads to an even bigger problem.
The social and political forces that shape what is fair and legal can be a country's social movements and procedural justice system.
<h3 /><h3>What is social justice?</h3>
It is a philosophy based on equity between individuals, regardless of their social, physical or economic characteristics, for example. Social justice is based on equality of:
- Rights
- Opportunities
- Treatment
Therefore, historically, social movements were responsible for achieving greater rights for citizens, forming a basis for procedural justice.
Find out more about Social Justice here:
brainly.com/question/4537505
#SPJ1
