as a fraction of 180, m < 1 = 1/ (1 + 3 + 2) * 180 = 1/6 * 180 = 30 degrees
m < 2 = 3*30 = 90 degrees
and m < 3 = 30*2 = 60 degrees
so x^2 + 3x + 2 = 2x+3
or x^2 + x = 1
After that just use the a quadratic equation formula
Hey - I need the graph to be able to help you. If you're on a computer, and it's a PC, you can use the snipping tool found in the start menu. Snip the graphs, then copy and paste them into a new question. If you're on a mac, command+shift+4 will get you a screenshot. Screenshot the graphs, go to finder, go to desktop, find your screenshot, then copy and paste it into a new question. :)
Sorry I can't help but I need the graph. :)
Answer:
$8.50
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
6: Reason 2 - substitution, Statement 4 - PR congruent to PR, Reason 4 - reflexive property, Reason 5 - AAS
8: Rotation
Step-by-step explanation:
6: Since both of the given angles equal 90°, you can <em>substitute</em> Angle RPT in to make Angle PRQ congruent to Angle RPT. Then, since both triangles share Line PR, <em>PR would be congruent to PR</em> by the <em>reflexive property</em>. And since you know that Angle Q is congruent to Angle T, you can see that Triangle QRP is congruent to Triangle TPR by the <em>AAS theorem</em>.
8: Since the 1st triangle is pointing to the right and the 2nd triangle is pointing downward, this would be a rotation of 90° clockwise (or 90° counterclockwise if the 1st triangle is the one pointing downward)
I don't have 7, sorry.
Also (if you haven't noticed it already), there's a typo in the 1st statement of the proof. Just thought I'd let you know ;)
