<span>The action in 2008 in which milk prices increased and one milk consumer stated that the reason he cut down on milk consumption is so that he could drive his car represents </span>movement along the demand curve for milk.
<span>Movement along the demand curve usually occurs when the manufacturer raises or lowers the price of the product.</span>
Hard question thx for the points give me brainlest points plz
Where marginal cost equals marginal effort.
Marginal cost is the additional cost for producing each additional unit, and marginal effort is the additional work per unit
Solution :
a). In the context, Jim received $ 275 for the car repairing services form some member from the club. In this exchange of the services, an income is been received in amount of a value of the services received ( the gross income includes receipt of the services and also the money and goods). Therefore, Jim is being taxed on an amount of $275 for the car repair services.
b). The issue in this case is whether a "credit" represents the valuable right. As the right can be redeemed for the that is property worth of $150, then under the constructive receipt, Jim must recognize an income of $150.
c). Jim received an credit of $450 to be applied for the next year. If the credit can be redeemed or used for any future services, the taxpayer then can argue that the realization has not yet occurred. But, it has be included in Jim's gross income for the next year when his credit amount becomes the valuable right.
Answer:
Grant the employee's motion, because fraud and misconduct of an adverse party are proper grounds for relief, and she filed within the appropriate time frame.
Explanation:
An employee sued her employer in federal court for sexual harassment. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the employer. Three months after the verdict, the employee's attorney received an anonymous letter stating that a key document presented at trial by the employer had been altered. The employee moved for relief from judgment, alleging that a document presented by her employer at trial had been altered. Grant the employee's motion, because fraud and misconduct of an adverse party are proper grounds for relief, and she filed within the appropriate time frame.
