Well the place is better because of the dam because it provides us with fresh clean water and it provides fresh clean water to the cities downstreams, plus power and electricity. however he says it harms the wildlife like for example the rare fish and animals plus the scenery. hope this helps!
Answer:
What caused Schaffer to instruct his assistant to strike Box 342, accidentally sending firefighters to the wrong place was:
B. the dark, hazy night and the tall buildings
Explanation:
The passage establishes the cause-and-effect relationship very clearly. According to the author, Shaffer was trying to determine the exact location of the flames he could see in the distance. However, <u>"This wasn't easy because of the distance and tall buildings between him and the flames. In addition, the moonless sky was made even murkier by the swirling, smoky haze."</u> After offering that explanation, the author says Schaffer instructed his assistant to strike Box 342. What we have here is:
- Cause: the night was dark and hazy; there were also tall buildings making it difficult to determine the location;
- Effect: Schaffer mistook the location of the fire and instructed his assistant to strike Box 342.
I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is option D. The diction of <span>"What the Black Man Wants" would be best described as formal and scholarly. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day. Feel free to ask more questions.</span>
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
The cut provides a better way to enjoy the fish, in addition to providing a visual appeal to dishes made with this type of food.
The cut can change the look that the fish is offered. The look, in spi, will not alter the flavor that the prepared fish should have, but it does provide a visual appeal that can be a differential when buying the fish or a dish made by him.
In addition, the cut can provide lighter parts with lower fat content, as it allows more tastful parts to be removed from the fish, in addition, it allows parts that are not of interest to the consumer to be discarded.
Answer:
FCC v. Fox Television Stations
