Answer:
The third one counting from the top.
Step-by-step explanation:
We have the inequality:
(-1/3)*(2x + 1) < 3
The first thing we need to do is isolate x on one side of the inequality.
First we can by -3 in both sides of the inequality, and remember, because we are multiplying by a negative number, the inequality sign changes its direction:
(-3)*(-1/3)*(2x + 1) > 3*(-3)
(2x + 1) > -9
Now we can subtract 1 in both sides:
2*x + 1 - 1 > -9 - 1
2*x > -10
Now we can divide by 2 in both sides:
2*x/2 > -10/2
x > -5
Then we should see a number line such that all the points at the right of -5 are colored.
The correct option is the third one, counting from the top.
Im guessing this is simplify so the answer would be
<span><span>−<span>5.7n</span></span>+6.7</span><span>n
</span>__________
n
Answer:
For this case the p value calculated is higher than the significance level used of 0.05 so then we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and the best conclusion for this case would be:
a) do not reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the mean IQ is not greater than 100
Step-by-step explanation:
Information given
We want to verify if he mean IQ of employees in an organization is greater than 100 , the system of hypothesis would be:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
The statistic for this case is given by:
(1)
The statistic calculated for this case 
The degrees of freedom are given by:
Now we can find the p value using tha laternative hypothesis and we got:
For this case the p value calculated is higher than the significance level used of 0.05 so then we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and the best conclusion for this case would be:
a) do not reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the mean IQ is not greater than 100