1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
LekaFEV [45]
3 years ago
7

5) Under this present administration (Biden) they always talk about my body my choice when it comes to Abortion why all of a sud

den is it not my body my choice when it comes to vaccines? Isn't this Hypocrisy? Your opinions are welcome!
History
1 answer:
Zanzabum3 years ago
8 0
Hey!! this is an amazing question actually! i think probably because a vaccine is more to protect others, why wouldn’t you want to protect others? and an abortion is more you do if you’re at risk or the baby won’t make it, or someone can’t afford a baby, it’s for their own well-being. vaccines are to keep yourself and others safe. :))
You might be interested in
What do green parties fight for
alisha [4.7K]

Answer:A Green party is a formally organized political party based on the principles of green politics, such as social justice, environmentalism and nonviolence. Greens believe that these issues are inherently related to one another as a foundation for world peace.

8 0
3 years ago
Which of these describes the judiciary act of 1789? A congressional change to the constitution. B a formal amendment to the cons
laiz [17]
A formal amendment to the constitution
4 0
3 years ago
How did the 2012 election reveal changes in American political and social practices? How did it represent continuities?
lions [1.4K]

Answer:

Between January 2011 and October 2012, governors signed into law twenty-three bills that imposed constraints on voting. Many of these measures mandated the presentation of a state-issued photo identification such as a driver’s license. In June 2012, the Republican majority in the Pennsylvania legislature took up the issue of voter identification cards, a topic of great interest to Republican-controlled legislatures in other states as well. The purported impetus for voter IDs was the prevalence of fraud—of voters presenting themselves at more than one polling station or of assuming someone else’s identity.

But the 2012 election was not only about the African American vote, though that was an important story. Another interesting aspect of the election was how it reflected changing demographics in the U.S., and how those demographics might impact the political party system for some time to come.

Presidential elections are gold mines for historians. They are more than teaching moments; their lessons can fill a classroom for an academic year and beyond. Presidential elections are both a detailed snapshot of America at one particular moment and a window on the nation to be. The 2012 presidential election in the U.S. was particularly rich in both its depiction of the country at that time and its portent of America’s future.*

It would be difficult to top the historic import of the 2008 presidential election when voters elected America’s first black president. However, the 2012 contest had its own unique features, not least of which was the re-election of a black president. In addition, for the first time in American history, neither the presidential nor vice presidential candidate of the major political parties was a white Protestant. Mitt Romney, the Republican nominee for president, is a Mormon; his vice-presidential running mate, Wisconsin Congressman Paul Ryan, is a Roman Catholic. On the Democratic side, Presidential Barack Obama is a black Protestant, and Vice President Joe Biden is a Roman Catholic. Given the changes in American demography, this party line-up will become more common in the future. Here’s why.

Most of the parties’ face-to-face campaigning and political advertising concentrated in the swing states. The candidates made occasional forays into states such as California and New York (both solidly Democratic) or Texas (solidly Republican) only for fund-raising not for on-the-ground campaigning. The election-day surprise was that Barack Obama lost only one swing state—North Carolina—and that by a margin of less than one percent. In fact, the president lost only two states he won in 2008: Indiana and North Carolina. This was a remarkable feat considering the pundits’ predictions of a very close election.

The second surprise was the remarkable turnout of the African American electorate. Since the passage of the Voting Rights Act in 1965, the registration of black voters has grown to be equal to that of white registrants: slightly better than two-thirds of the eligible electorate. However, turnout among black voters has historically been less than the turnout among whites. Turnout is often a function of class: poor people vote less often than more affluent voters. Turnout is also a function of opportunity: the ease of accessing polling places, the time to wait in lines, and the weather. Poorer people, tied to jobs, family care issues, and the daily grind of survival may have priorities that take precedence over casting a ballot on a given day.

In recent years, however, changes in the voting process have enabled less affluent voters to vote on a more flexible schedule. Many states have installed early voting procedures that allow registrants to cast ballots as much as three weeks prior to the election day (the first Tuesday in November). Also, the registration process has become easier, with more venues open to enroll voters. Finally, particularly in those states and counties (mostly in the South), the 1965 Voting Rights Act has required any change in the electoral process to be pre-cleared by Washington for its impact on minority voting rights. (The U.S. Supreme Court struck down this pre-clearance provision of the Act in an Alabama case, Shelby County v. Holder, on June 25, 2013.)

Explanation:

William Gastown analysis the political backdrop against which the 2012 general campaign was waged, offering fuller context into voter attitudes, the composition of the winning coalition, and the events, economic realities, policy and ideological issues that shaped the election and President Obama’s eventual victory.

Examination into demographic and attitudinal changes that paved the way for an Obama reelection, including the rise of voter engagement and mobilization of women, Latino, African American

Analysis into how this election did little, if anything, to decrease political dysfunction and polarization in Washington, an unfortunate trend that continues to threaten U.S. governance.

7 0
3 years ago
Where did the American revolution come from
mash [69]

Answer:

Described as "the shot heard round the world," British soldiers (also called red coats) in April of 1775 and minutemen (the colonists' militia) exchanged gunfire at Lexington and Concord in Massachusetts. This signaled the start of the American Revolution.

Best of luck!

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In college, King decided he would become a
xz_007 [3.2K]

Answer:

A. minister

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • At the end of the 1800s, the United States was unable to expand trade with China because?
    12·1 answer
  • How did the settlement patterns change during the industrial revolution
    7·1 answer
  • What prevented the Bantu from migrating to every part Africa
    14·1 answer
  • One of the advantages of a bicameral legislature, composed of the House and Senate, is it
    14·2 answers
  • What provide for the common defense mean
    8·2 answers
  • The soviet union built the berlin wall in the aftermath of the
    9·1 answer
  • State governments are equal in power to the federal government T/F
    5·1 answer
  • What conditions do you think might help to prevent the rise of dictators?
    9·1 answer
  • You decide to charge your new cellphone on a credit card and pay it off immediately. Does this help or hurt your credit? Why or
    8·1 answer
  • Guys Please help 50 points
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!