1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mash [69]
3 years ago
13

In your opinion, is taking the law into one's own hands

History
1 answer:
Svet_ta [14]3 years ago
4 0
The simple answer to your complex question is NO. This is assuming that you live in a country where there are good laws (remember that history is full of bad governments that implemented bad laws) and that law enforcement is effective. Simplisticly, you should only ask yourself this question when your or your families life is being threatened and law enforcement is not around. Your response must still be within the constraints of your laws or you will find yourself in hot water. I'm not even going to try to discuss the ethics and morals that can apply as the situation can vary immensely. Keep it simple - don't operate outside the law, rather fight against unjust laws.
You might be interested in
Choose the Statements to accurately describe the crusades.
Salsk061 [2.6K]
<span>The virtually ended trade between Europe and the Middle East for centuries. </span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the south Pacific region shown on this map, which factor MOST led to the use of over 1,000 languages there up through start o
ruslelena [56]

Answer: B) lack of effective and speedy transportation

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Can someone help me answer these questions
max2010maxim [7]
1: He’s holding a sword

2:There is a ship
3:those are aliens. I think
8 0
2 years ago
Which section of Texas is known for its many lakes, reservoirs, and hills?
GalinKa [24]

Answer:

A. Llano Basin

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Treaty of versailles main points how you would change them for the better? need it for a essay
kumpel [21]

Answer/Explanation

The Treaty of Versailles could have been improved in many ways. First, more countries could have helped pay for the damage, The treaty gave some German territories to neighboring countries and placed other German territories. It would have been a more settled argument if they used the 14 points which were general and not bias.  they could have made it better by more countries could have helped pay for the damage because all of the countries took part in this war. international disarmament, free trade, an international legal system, and collective security. Wilson believed war could be eliminated from the world with democracy, self-determination of rule for all nations, open diplomacy, This also could have been improved because the treaty of Versailles only blamed one country.

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • According to the doctrine of preemption, which statements is true?
    6·1 answer
  • The _____ was the proposed Reconstruction plan supported by Radical Republicans.
    10·1 answer
  • Compare and contrast New England and chespeake
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following best states an interpretation of the Second Amendment?
    14·1 answer
  • which of the following events was most important in moving the policies of the United States from isolationism to internationali
    13·1 answer
  • What was a benefit of Terrance farming during the Neolithic era ​
    7·1 answer
  • How did ancient Greek and Roman philosophy inspire the Enlightenments
    13·1 answer
  • DUE IN ONE MINUTE NO LINKS OR BE REPORTED
    11·1 answer
  • Can someone answer this question for me please 2-3 sentences please hurry
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following countries would have been a member of NATO?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!