Yes to debate or to agree you need to infer
Answer:
Even though this question is missing the options, after analyzing the revision we can safely say it was made for <u>conciseness</u>.
Explanation:
Conciseness can be simply defined as saying a lot in just a few words. Notice how the original paragraph is much longer than the revised one. The writer gave much more information than what was truly necessary. Details such as "and that new procedures need to be initiated" and "who was sympathetic" are superfluous. The first one adds nothing of value. If the procedures are inadequate, it is quite obvious that new ones need to be initiated. Readers could infer that. The second one is permeated with subjectivity, not only making the paragraph longer, but also stating an opinion that in uncalled for in this context. By eliminating the extra words, the writer made the paragraph concise, using fewer words to express the necessary.
Answer:
the author
Explanation:
naive, not quite confident of his own identity, judges a book by its cover, doesn't always stay true to himself, really loves fishing, is willing to do almost anything for a girl he likes. As an older person, seems to have learned from the lesson and is grateful for what it has taught him. (Be able to give SPECIFIC examples of any characteristic you list for him.
I think it is the second one! I am pretty sure!