All categories

2 years ago

Solve for x. -(-2-5x) + (-2) = 18 X=-90 X=-18/5 X=18/5 X=90

Mathematics

1 answer:

mash [69]2 years ago

6 0

Hope it helps I guesss

You might be interested in

John and Martha are contemplating having children, but John’s brother has galactosemia (an autosomal recessive disease) and Mart

Rina8888 [55]

<h2>Answer:</h2>

$Probability=\frac{1}{24}$

<h2>Step-by-step explanation:</h2>

As the question states,

John's brother has Galactosemia which states that his parents were both the carriers.

Therefore, the chances for the John to have the disease is = 2/3

Now,

Martha's great-grandmother also had the disease that means her children definitely carried the disease means probability of 1.

Now, one of those children married with a person.

So,

Probability for the child to have disease will be = 1/2

Now, again the child's child (Martha) probability for having the disease is = 1/2.

Therefore,

<u>The total probability for Martha's first child to be diagnosed with Galactosemia will be,</u>

$Probability=\frac{2}{3}\times \frac{1}{2}\times \frac{1}{2}\times \frac{1}{4}\\Probability=\frac{1}{24}$

(Here, we assumed that the child has the disease therefore, the probability was taken to be = 1/4.)

<em><u>Hence, the probability for the first child to have Galactosemia is $\frac{1}{24}$ </u></em>

3 0

3 years ago

A student is trying to solve the system of two equations given below: Equation P: y + z = 6 Equation Q: 8y + 7z = 1 Which of the

Sergeeva-Olga [200]

<span>P: y + z = 6
Q: 8y + 7z = 1

A. This makes y = -8Y which will eliminate the "y"'s when the equations are added.

</span>

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Use Stokes' Theorem to evaluate C F · dr F(x, y, z) = xyi + yzj + zxk, C is the boundary of the part of the paraboloid z = 1 − x

Serggg [28]

I assume $C$ has counterclockwise orientation when viewed from above.

By Stokes' theorem,

$\displaystyle\int_C\vec F\cdot\mathrm d\vec r=\iint_S(\nabla\times\vec F)\cdot\mathrm d\vec S$

so we first compute the curl:

$\vec F(x,y,z)=xy\,\vec\imath+yz\,\vec\jmath+xz\,\vec k$

$\implies\nabla\times\vec F(x,y,z)=-y\,\vec\imath-z\,\vec\jmath-x\,\vec k$

Then parameterize $S$ by

$\vec r(u,v)=\cos u\sin v\,\vec\imath+\sin u\sin v\,\vec\jmath+\cos^2v\,\vec k$

where the $z$ -component is obtained from

$1-(\cos u\sin v)^2-(\sin u\sin v)^2=1-\sin^2v=\cos^2v$

with $0\le u\le\dfrac\pi2$ and $0\le v\le\dfrac\pi2$ .

Take the normal vector to $S$ to be

$\vec r_v\times\vec r_u=2\cos u\cos v\sin^2v\,\vec\imath+\sin u\sin v\sin(2v)\,\vec\jmath+\cos v\sin v\,\vec k$

Then the line integral is equal in value to the surface integral,

$\displaystyle\iint_S(\nabla\times\vec F)\cdot\mathrm d\vec S$

$=\displaystyle\int_0^{\pi/2}\int_0^{\pi/2}(-\sin u\sin v\,\vec\imath-\cos^2v\,\vec\jmath-\cos u\sin v\,\vec k)\cdot(\vec r_v\times\vec r_u)\,\mathrm du\,\mathrm dv$

$=\displaystyle-\int_0^{\pi/2}\int_0^{\pi/2}\cos v\sin^2v(\cos u+2\cos^2v\sin u+\sin(2u)\sin v)\,\mathrm du\,\mathrm dv=\boxed{-\frac{17}{20}}$

6 0

3 years ago

The answer and how you got the answer

olasank [31]

Answer:

$\frac{34}{15}$

Step-by-step explanation:

we are asked to evaluate

$4\tfrac{1}{4}$ ÷ $1\tfrac{7}{8}$

Above we are given mixed fraction which can be converted in proper fraction using formula given below

$a\tfrac{b}{c}=\frac{a \times c +b}{c}$

Hence

$4\tfrac{1}{4}=\frac{4 \times 4 +1}{4}$

$4\tfrac{1}{4}=\frac{17}{4}$

Also

$1\tfrac{7}{8}=\frac{1 \times 8 +7}{8}$

$1\tfrac{7}{8}=\frac{15}{8}$

Hence

$4\tfrac{1}{4}$ ÷ $1\tfrac{7}{8}$

can be written as

$\frac{17}{4}$ ÷ $\frac{15}{8}$

Also we know the rule for dividing fraction is as given below

$\frac{a}{b}$ ÷ $\frac{c}{d}$ = $\frac{a}{b} \times \frac{d}{c}$

Hence

$\frac{17}{4}$ ÷ $\frac{15}{8}$ = $\frac{17}{4} \times \frac{8}{15}$

= $\frac{17 \times 2}{15}$

= $\frac{34}{15}$

8 0

3 years ago

A man drove his car a distance of 260 miles in 4 hours. If continuing at this rate is possible, he will travel ____ miles in 8 h

spayn [35]

Answer:

520 miles

Step-by-step explanation:

since 4 is half of 8, you just multiply 260 by 2.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers