All categories

2 years ago

Enter the next 3 terms from the geometric sequence below. 5, 10, 20, …

Mathematics

1 answer:

Artyom0805 [142]2 years ago

3 0

Answer:

5, 10, 20, 40, 80, 160

Step-by-step explanation:

5-10 is double 5. 10-20 is double 10 meaning you double each time

Double 20 is 40

Double 40 is 80

Double 80 is 160

You might be interested in

I am less than 10 I am not a multiple of 2 I am a composite number

Rama09 [41]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Composite Numbers before 10: 4, 6, 8, and 9

The only one of those 4 that is NOT a multiple of 2: 9

4 0

3 years ago

In the figure, TP and TS are opposite rays. TQ bisects < RTP.

Ket [755]

Answer:

search-icon-image

Class 9

>>Maths

>>Quadrilaterals

>>Quadrilaterals and Their Various Types

>>In Fig. 6.43, if PQ PS, PQ∥ SR, SQR = 2

Question

Bookmark

In Fig. 6.43, if PQ⊥PS,PQ∥SR,∠SQR=28

and ∠QRT=65

, then find the values of x and y.

463685

expand

Medium

Solution

verified

Verified by Toppr

Given, PQ⊥PS,PQ∥SR,∠SQR=28

∘

,∠QRT=65

∘

According to the question,

x+∠SQR=∠QRT (Alternate angles as QR is transversal.)

⇒x+28

∘

=65

∘

⇒x=37

∘

Also ∠QSR=x

⇒∠QSR=37

∘

Also ∠QRS+∠QRT=180

∘

(Linear pair)

⇒∠QRS+65

∘

=180

∘

⇒∠QRS=115

∘

Now, ∠P+∠Q+∠R+∠S=360

∘

(Sum of the angles in a quadrilateral.)

⇒90

∘

+65

∘

+115

∘

+∠S=360

∘

⇒270

∘

+y+∠QSR=360

∘

⇒270

∘

+y+37

∘

=360

∘

⇒307

∘

+y=360

∘

⇒y=53

∘

Step-by-step explanation:

please mark me as brainlist please

6 0

2 years ago

Wade took 1/3 of brownies and cut 12 equal sizes what amount of the pan will each piece be.

IrinaVladis [17]

Answer: each 1/3 would be 4 brownies.

Step-by-step explanation: 12 divided by 3 is 4.

3 0

3 years ago

Which set of steps will translate f(x)=6x to g(x)=6x-5-7

Maurinko [17]

THIS IS THE COMPLETE QUESTION BELOW;

Which set of steps will translate f(x) = 6x to g(x) = 6x – 5 – 7?

Shift f(x) = 6x five units to the left and seven units up.

Shift f(x) = 6x five units to the right and seven units down.

Shift f(x) = 6x seven units to the right and five units up.

Shift f(x) = 6x seven units to the left and five units down.

Answer:

Shift f(x)=6x five units to the left and seven units down.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are told to translate the function below

f(x) = 6x to g(x) = 6x – 5 – 7

Which means the process to translate f(x) into g(x) is required.

According to the translation rule

f(x)-------->f(x)+a

If a<0 it shift to downward

If a>0 it shift to upward

Then we have

(X,y) ----->((x - 5, y)

There is a shift by x coordinates towards left by 5 units

then we would have the function as

f'(x) = 6(x-5)

Following the translation rule there is a shift by the function by 7 units downward direction then we have

(x,y) ----->(x,y -7)

Then we have g(x) = 6x – 5 – 7 as our translation product.

Therefore, shift f(x)=6x five units to the left and seven units down.

7 0

3 years ago

A teacher was interested in finding out whether a special study program would increase the scores of students on a national exam

bija089 [108]

Answer:

Check the explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

Going by the first attached image below we reject H_o against H_1 if obs. $T > t_{\alpha /2;n-1}$

here obs.T=1.879

$\therefore obs.T \ngtr 2.447=t_{0.025;6}$

we accept $H_o:\mu _{1}=\mu_{2}$ at 5% level of significance.

i.e there is no sufficient evidence to indicate that the special study program is more effective at 5% level of significance.

this problem is simillar to the previous one except the alternative hypothesis.

Let X_i's denote the bonuses given by female managers and Y_i's denote the bonuses given by male managers.

we assume that $X_i \sim N(\mu _{1},\sigma _{1}^{2}) Y_i \sim N(\mu _{2},\sigma _{2}^{2})$ independently

We want to test $H_0:\mu_{1}=\mu_{2} vs H_1:\mu_{1}\neq \mu_{2}$

define $D_i=X_i-Y_i , i=1(1)8$

now $D_i\sim N(\mu _{1}-\mu _{2}=\mu _{D},\sigma _{1}^{2}+\sigma _{2}^{2}=\sigma _{D}^{2}) , i=1(1)8$

the hypothesis becomes

$H_0:\mu_{D}=0 vs H_1:\mu_{D}\neq 0$

in the third attached image, we use the same test statistic as before

i.e at 5% level of significance there is not enough evidence to indicate a difference in average bonuses .

3 0

3 years ago